The evidence that the suspect was at the scene of the crime includes eyewitness accounts, surveillance footage placing them at the location, and forensic evidence such as fingerprints or DNA linking them to the scene.
DNA evidence found at the crime scene can be compared to the suspect's DNA to determine if there is a match, providing a strong link between the suspect and the crime scene. Other evidence such as fingerprints, footprints, or personal belongings left at the scene can also help link a suspect to a crime. Eyewitness testimony or surveillance footage placing the suspect at the scene can further establish their connection.
An example of indirect evidence is finding footprints near a crime scene that match the suspect's shoe size and style, but without directly linking the suspect to the crime. This evidence could suggest the suspect was present at the scene, but does not definitively prove their involvement in the crime.
f*** i dont know
Hair. It can be left behind by a suspect and used as evidence to link them to a crime scene through DNA analysis.
DNA evidence found at a crime scene can help solve a criminal investigation by linking the suspect to the scene of the crime.
Guilt of the suspect(s)
A primary crime scene is where the actual crime took place, such as a murder scene. A secondary crime scene is a location related to the crime, like where evidence or a body was dumped or a suspect was apprehended.
Forensic investigators use genetic markers that vary from person to person. Thus, if all of the genetic markers in the DNA from a crime scene are identical to the genetic markers in the DNA from one of the suspects, that is good evidence that the suspect and crime scene DNA came from the same individual.
Yes, blood can be considered direct evidence in a crime scene investigation because it can provide crucial information about the events that occurred, such as the presence of a victim or suspect at the scene.
The more personally identifiable a piece of evidence is, the closer it can be linked to the perpetrator.
The police had linked the crime to the suspect with the new evidence they had found.The police had linked the crime to the suspect with the new evidence they had found.The police had linked the crime to the suspect with the new evidence they had found.The police had linked the crime to the suspect with the new evidence they had found.The police had linked the crime to the suspect with the new evidence they had found.The police had linked the crime to the suspect with the new evidence they had found.The police had linked the crime to the suspect with the new evidence they had found.The police had linked the crime to the suspect with the new evidence they had found.The police had linked the crime to the suspect with the new evidence they had found.The police had linked the crime to the suspect with the new evidence they had found.The police had linked the crime to the suspect with the new evidence they had found.
Simply, A fingerprint can prove the precense of any suspect at a crime scene. If you have a suspect and you have a fingerprint lifted from a piece of evidence, and the two match, the chances are that your suspect was at the scene of the crime sometime recently.