Do some research. It's easiest to start with a tertiary source (e.g., http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alexander_the_Great) and look at the references section. It probably will mostly reference secondary sources. Look at their bibliographies, and you will start to uncover references to primary sources.
Your best hope, is that you will be able to use the search engine of your choice to find translations of the primary sources on-line. The worst-case scenario (assuming that there ARE any primary sources, and would think that for Alexander, there must be) would be that you will have to spend years studying ancient languages so that you can travel to foreign lands and read original manuscripts that lie in forgotten crypts buried at the sites of long forgotten monastaries.
Primary sources of Alexander Graham Bell include his original patents, such as the patent for the telephone filed in 1876, which outlines his invention's technical details. Additionally, his personal letters, diaries, and correspondence with contemporaries provide insights into his thoughts and experiences. Photographs and recordings from Bell's lifetime, along with newspaper articles documenting his inventions and public demonstrations, also serve as crucial primary sources.
encyclopedias
diaries,photos,videos,paintings,and letters
no
Some Bias
Some of the achievements of Alexander the Great are the victory at Issus, the victory at Gaugamela, and having the largest empire in history.
There is no solid evidence on his cause of death. Some sources suspect poison, some say malaria or typhoid fever. Malaria is carried by mosquitos, so it is possible.
dsdf
Primary sources (such as Arrian) say that there is some evidence in supporting this question of whether or not Alexander saved the Persian citizens, however repetitions of facts among sources point to some understanding that he did offer them some so called "freedom" in J.R Hamilton and a year 13 classics document i picked up that Persian's, with Alexander as king, were given benefits that were inevitably co-operative with the Persians, their religion and way of living and gave them advantages in the kingdom. The "freedom" could be exposed as such a general statement though and may contradict with other statements said about the Persians and the system they lived by. If you look at the way Darius ruled the Persians, then at the way Alexander ruled the Persians you could draw conclusions of "Freedom" from there.
What are some good reliable primary resources can you find on Jean Paul Marat
No, but some of the things they did back then where right.
dsdf