reincarnation , bad luck
No By definition - if it's true, it isn't superstition.
"Having no scientific basis" is pretty much the definition of "superstition". That's why.
Of or pertaining to superstition; proceeding from, or manifesting, superstition; as, superstitious rites; superstitious observances., Evincing superstition; overscrupulous and rigid in religious observances; addicted to superstition; full of idle fancies and scruples in regard to religion., Overexact; scrupulous beyond need.
None, by definition a superstition has no scientific principle.
No. By definition, a superstition is a belief that does not have a scientific basis.
D'jumbi is an evil spirit or bad luck when stranded on an island.
They don't. By definition, a superstition does not have a scientific basis.
plants:grass, flowers, trees, ect.
None do. By definition, superstitious beliefs do not have a scientific basis.
it depends what the superstition is, superstition itself is a feeling, something of the mind.
taste sensations or taste sensory nerves of the mouth.
By definition, a superstition is an unscientific belief. Science and technology are therefore unable to shake many people's superstitions. Lack of understanding of science and technology has led to the development of new superstitions, such as the belief that Mercury retrograde can cause your computer to malfunction.