King comands everybody below him
the Feudal system was shown as a triangle with the monarchs(kings and queens) on the top then lords, ladies, and noblesthen priests, nuns, knights, and vassals finally there was theserfs and peasants.
the monarchs during the feudal system were the feudal lords they were excepted to keep protection for their vassals
At the very bottom. They had no freedom and no one below them.
the feudal system for serfs was a bad thing because they always had to do work for the kings,lord and/or knights.
The vassals helped by keeping control of the armies and having the Kings reward them with land.
Kings depended on their nobles and vassals to provide knights and soldiers for their armies. These nobles and vassals were granted land in exchange for military service and loyalty to the king.
because there are more peasants than any kings, knights or lords. kings are the least populus.
In feudal Europe, the knights pledged their loyalty to the king. They fought for the king and the kingdom.
The short answer is "the feudal system." Nobles would raise armies from their own territories. Knights were, essentially, "officers" ... they were from wealthy aristocratic families who owned things like armor and swords. Being "knighted" was recognition from other knights (and ultimately from the nobles) that you had armor and a sword and were willing and able to use them in a way the other knights found acceptable. Lesser nobles ... those who didn't command much territory ... would recognize some higher-ranked noble as their feudal lord. In exchange for this, they could expect a certain amount of help if they were attacked, but in exchange would have to send taxes/tribute and knights (and potentially armies) to their feudal lord when requested. These higher-ranked nobles would then to the same to an even higher-ranked noble, and so on up the chain. The King would therefore have several vassals, each of whom would have their own vassals, many of them with their own vassals. If the king needed an army, he'd have some of his own knights, and would levy the nobles under him to provide more.
Yes, feuds were often lands granted to nobles by kings in the feudal system. In exchange for these lands, known as fiefs, nobles provided military service and loyalty to the king. This system established a hierarchy where the king retained ultimate control over the land while distributing it among his vassals. Thus, feudal relationships were built on mutual obligations between lords and vassals.
Vassalage is the relationship between the feudal lord and his vassal. Kings had higher lords as vassals, and higher lords had lower lords as vassals. The practice was called subinfeudation.
it wasn't a who , it was magna carta, a feudal document.