0
One of the problems Christians who accept evolution as fundamentally accurate face is the following: if the knowledge of our evolutionary history, as established by science, is accurate, then there would have been no literal Adam and Eve, and thus no original sin as The Bible depicts it. If this is so, then why did Jesus need to sacrifice himself?
Problems with theistic evolution are usually theological in nature, rather than scientific. The only real scientific problem with theistic evolution is a single question: is there any evidence to support the thesis that gods were involved with our evolution?
Another View:
The absence of transitional forms is an insurmountable hurdle for theistic evolutionists.
Another answer:"Once you have eliminated the impossible," the fictional detective Sherlock Holmes famously opined, "whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth."After all, if evolution is ever disproven, god and creationism would not come out on top. Scientists would look elsewhere for new evidence to explain the origins and diversity of life on this planet.
"God did it," is a cop-out and not based on fact or reason. You would first have to prove god exists and explain god's origins. It cannot come from nothing, yet creationist won't apply this same logic when speaking of their god.
As to the lack of transitional forms: that is not true you can go look for the morphological intermediates that *do* exist within the lineage of trilobites, and how that lineage itself fits neatly into the nested hierarchies of Biology.
What else can I help you with?
Why is theistic evolution a widely accepted theory?
Technically, theistic evolution isn't a theory. It's a religious belief. It's a belief that's widely held because many people feel that accepting the scientific theory of evolution does not conflict with their theistic beliefs.
What does Bill Craig say about the theory of evolution?
William Lane Craig, a Christian philosopher and theologian, is critical of the theory of evolution, particularly in its philosophical implications for materialism and naturalism. He argues that the theory of evolution cannot account for the existence of moral values, consciousness, or the fine-tuning of the universe. Craig advocates for a form of theistic evolution where God guides the evolutionary process to achieve his purposes.
What evolution is a compromise between the Bible and evolutionary science?
A:A compromise is sometimes described as an agreement by which neither side can be really happy. So it is with so-called 'theistic evolution', an attempted compromise that allows Christians to believe that God still had a role in creation as he guided evolution down its path, at the same time as they can accept that the science of evolution is proven. Many Christians remain unconvinced by this compromise because it means giving up long-held, cherished beliefs that God created every living thing just as we see it now, just 6000 years ago.Research scientists can not agree with the compromise because it leaves no room for natural selection, known to be the major driving force behind evolution.
Who proposed the theory of theistic evolution?
The term 'Theistic Evolution' was used by Eugenie Scott to refer to the theological view that God creates through evolution. Theistic evolution is not a scientific theory, but a particular view about how the science of evolution could relate to religious belief and interpretation.For more information, please visit: http://christianity.answers.com/theology/the-story-of-creation
What would it be like if there wasn't the theory of evolution?
It would be like it was before Darwin, people would either believe in a theistic origin or would simply assume the knowledge was beyond their understanding.
What are some problems in the theory of evolution?
Some potential problems in the theory of evolution include gaps in the fossil record, the origin of complex structures like the eye, and understanding the mechanisms driving rapid evolutionary changes. Additionally, determining the exact mechanisms of speciation and the role of epigenetics in evolution are ongoing challenges.
The various stages of stellar evolution predicted by theory can be tested using observations of stars in?
Yes you can
What is the difference between the theory of language and evolution?
Theory of evolution refers to animals and plants evolution along the time. Language evolution is another issue, not entirely related to the theory of evolution. It follows the theory of evolution on some way but it is related to culture evolution, not to the physical attributes evolution.
What is the Best Evidence to disprove Evolution?
There is no single piece of evidence that definitively disproves evolution. The theory of evolution is supported by a vast amount of evidence from various scientific fields, including genetics, paleontology, and comparative anatomy. Any challenges to the theory of evolution would need to provide substantial evidence and be subject to rigorous scientific scrutiny.
Is evolution a theory or hypothesis?
Evolution is an observed and observable fact. The theory of evolution by natural selection explains many things about evolution. The theory generates testable hypothesis, as any good theory does. Remember, theory is the highest concept in science.
Do scientists believe man was created by God or that they just evolved?
Different scientists hold different beliefs. Many scientists accept the theory of evolution as a scientific explanation for the diversity of life on Earth. However, there are also scientists who believe in theistic evolution, which posits that evolution is a process guided by a higher power, such as God. Ultimately, beliefs about the origins of humans vary among scientists.
Evolution is a guess or a serious theory?
Evolution itself is a fact, as it can be observered in both the environment and in the laboratory. A theory is a statement or series of statements which describes and explains a natural phenomenon based upon a solid foundation of evidence. The theory of evolution fits into the criteria of a theory.
