In his epistles, Paul mentions Peter as a pillar of the Jerusalem Church in the forties or fifties, when he was presumably in his late middle age. Acts of the Apostles gives a somewhat different story in which Peter took more of a leading role in the Jerusalem Church. Neither source tells us of the final years of Peter.
Christian tradition says that Peter went to Rome to lead the Christian Church there, and that he was crucified upside down, but this is a legen that seems to have originated in the second century. Clement of Rome wrote around 95 CE (1 Clement) in general terms about the life of Peter and the 'labours' he faced, but seems neither to have known that Peter ever went to Rome nor how he died.
The second-century pope, Anicetus (156-166) claimed that Peter had travelled to Rome to lead the Christians there, and had been beheaded in Rome, meaning that he spoke with the authority of the apostle Peter. Origen, writing in the third century, changed this to say that Peter was sentenced to crucifixion but, feeling unworthy of being crucified like Jesus, asked to be crucified upside down.
There is no reason to accept the word of Origen over that of Anicetus, and no reason to accept the word of Anicetus over that of Clement. We do not know what happened to Peter, but in the absence of evidence to the contrary we can assume that he died of old age, probably in or near Palestine.
Peter the Apostle was believed to have been crucified upside down in Rome during the reign of Emperor Nero, as he did not consider himself worthy to be crucified in the same manner as Jesus.
It was Peter as he was crucified in Rome.
There is no scripture reference that places Peter in Rome. Any such evidences are outside the Bible.
Saint Peter on the orders of Nero,
According to tradition, St. Peter the Apostle was buried in Rome, specifically in a necropolis on Vatican Hill where St. Peter's Basilica now stands. His tomb was discovered in 1940 and confirmed by archaeological investigations in the following years.
The Apostle Peter was martyred in Rome, and his successors in Rome remained there to continue his leadership of the Church. Geography is unimportant, history happens to place him in Rome.
Saint Peter is believed to have lived in Babylon and Rome outside of his mission as an apostle. Traditionally, he is said to have settled in Rome, where he was eventually martyred.
As you are not clear on which apostle. Peter went to Rome, Thomas to India, and Paul made 3 missionary journeys to Antioch, Ephesus, Corinth and Thessolinica.
Catholic tradition says that the apostle Peter went to Rome to lead the Christians there, and that he was the first pope. There is no actual evidence that Peter ever went to Rome, and Clement of Rome, writing (1 Clement) just thirty years after Peter was supposedly in Rome, appears to have been unaware that Peter had been to Rome. The tradition that Peter was in Rome is believed to have begun during the second century, probably by Anicetus of Rome.If the pope is the bishop of Rome there could not have been a pope until the role was established in the second century. In the view of some, Anicetus might have been the first to hold that position, an his assertion that Peter was his predecessor would have strengthened his authority.For more information, please visit:http://christianity.answers.com/catholicism/a-brief-history-of-the-early-popes
Peter was a very old man when he was crucified on the cross in Rome.
It was formed in Jerusalem by Jesus Christ and given to the Apostle Peter to be the Head of it. Paul the Apostle to the Gentiles spread the "good news" around the world and started the Church in Rome.
St. Peter the Apostle Church was created in 1842.