Partial inspiration
it views that only parts of The Bible are the inspired word of God. The bible contains the word of God but is not itself the word of God.the weakness with this theory is how you can be sure of what is an inspiration/ God-breathed
Partial inspiration is a phrase used in biblical studies. It states that although God did inspire parts of Scripture, he failed to identify the part which was inspired.
Limited inspiration is the theory that parts of Scripture are "Inspired" or "God breathed" and other parts of Scripture are not.
The verbal theory of inspiration asserts that divine inspiration extends to the very words of the sacred texts, ensuring their accuracy and authority. According to this view, every word in the Bible or other religious scripture is divinely inspired and carries divine meaning.
The theory that suggests scripture is only inspired in matters of religious dogma is known as "limited inspiration" or "partial inspiration." This view posits that while the Bible may contain divine truths regarding faith and morality, it is not necessarily inerrant or authoritative in historical or scientific matters. Proponents argue that the human authors' cultural and historical contexts influence the text, allowing for discrepancies outside of spiritual teachings.
The Galapagos
David L. Colton has written: 'Analytic theory of partial differential equations' -- subject(s): Differential equations, Partial, Numerical solutions, Partial Differential equations 'Partial differential equations' -- subject(s): Differential equations, Partial, Partial Differential equations
revived the atomic theory and stated the law of Partial Pressures of gases
Robert Carmichael has written: 'On the general theory of the integration of non-linear partial differential equations' -- subject(s): Differential equations, Partial, Partial Differential equations
The Galapagos Islands.
The dictation theory of inspiration posits that the Bible was essentially dictated by God to the human authors, who acted as passive instruments in recording the words. This view suggests that the human writers were merely transcribers and not actively involved in the process of writing.