Ethical Relativism is operating in a system of situational ethics. Thou shalt not steal, unless you get a chance to steal from a big corporation, the government or someone you don't like. You are faithful to your wife, except on business trips, when everybody cheats, right? Basically, it means being comfortable with shifting your ethics to meet the situation. I try to maintain my ethics in all situations, however though I believe in thou shalt not kill, ants, flies and roaches die if I find them in my house and if you break into my home and come up the stairs, you are a direct threat to my family's safety and I will blow you away with little to no warning. But since I know these are my ethics, family before thief, I do not consider that a case of situational ethics.
Also see "moral relativism".
In ethics one must approach the situation from the ethical relativism point of view. Ethical relativism places the decision between right or wrong with the group of people affected.
what is the fundamental difference between act utilitarianism and ethical relativism? is a good and bad discussion about the true of life
Relativism and absolutism are two contrasting approaches to ethical decision-making. Relativism suggests that ethical principles are subjective and vary depending on the context or culture, while absolutism holds that certain ethical principles are universal and apply in all situations. These two perspectives often conflict in ethical dilemmas, with relativism emphasizing flexibility and context, and absolutism emphasizing consistency and universal principles.
Individual ethical relativism is the belief that each person sets their own moral standards based on their own personal beliefs, experiences, and circumstances. This means that what is considered right or wrong can vary from person to person, depending on their individual perspective.
spirituality and peace of mind.
Absolutism believes in universal moral principles that apply to all situations, while relativism holds that ethical decisions depend on the context and cultural norms. Absolutism emphasizes objective truths, while relativism emphasizes subjective perspectives.
Define and contrast the three ethical perspectives. Relativism,Emotivism,Ethical Egoism:How do the perspectives differ from the ethical theories? What does each ethical perspective tell us about morality and virtue?
There are different types of ethical judgments and ethical reasoning's that are based on beliefs/ Egoism, justice, deontology, and relativism are different points of view.
Ethical relativism denies universal moral principles, claiming that moral codes are strictly subjective. Ethical situationalism states moral principles are objective, and should be applied differently in different contexts.
Freedom-based ethics
Ayer stated that the 3 problems that afflict traditional relativism are 1 moral or ethical judgement 2 obligation 3 disagreement.
Absolutism holds that there are universal moral principles that apply to all situations, while relativism believes that moral principles are subjective and vary depending on the context. Absolutism emphasizes objective truths and rules, while relativism emphasizes the importance of individual perspectives and cultural norms in ethical decision-making.