answersLogoWhite

0

In the field of apologetics, the argument is largely accepted as a invalid one, beeing incorret in the face of science (in order to have an hypothesis as the best explanation of a event, you don't have to have the explanation of the explanation), in the face of logic (when arguing that the designer would be at least as complex as the universe, one must assume that materialism is truth, but materialism is a view incompatible with the existence of God, and therefore is a logical fallacy of begging the question - it assumes the non-existence of God in the premiss) and in the face of theology (God, as a unbody mind, is not complex; therefore, inferring a complexibility on Him would be incoherent).

User Avatar

Wiki User

9y ago

What else can I help you with?