Many claims are made that creation is right and evolution is wrong, as you suggest.
However, this is far from reality. Evolution is both a well-documented scientific fact and a theory. Creation is a religious belief based on the presence of the universe - if something exists, it must have somehow been created.
The belief that evolution (or science in general) must be at odds with religion is largely in error, as Eugenie Scott of the National Center for Science Education points out. Many mainstream christian religions find faith in God perfectly compatible with modern science. Darwin's theory of evolution delved into every aspect of the subject known at the time. Since then, however, science has made enormous progress filling in the details. Darwin knew virtually nothing of molecular biology, which is now a cornerstone of evolutionary science, and exquisitely demonstrates the kin-ships and common ancestral relationships of virtually all extant species.
Young earth creationism, the notion that all organisms were created simultaneously around 6000 years ago remains clearly and demonstrably wrong.
A:
Simply put, it is because one is based on divine revelation, and the other on human speculation: "let God be true, but every man a liar" Romans 3:4. Besides that, discoveries in science, that were made from Charles Darwin's time and up to now have rendered his theory more extinct then the dinosaurs, but you will have to do your own research, if you are interested in science.
Looking at this issue from the Biblical perspective, if evolution was to be proven correct, it would make The Bible and Christianity irrelevant.
Another Answer:
A question of much debate in recent history. And the obvious reason for the rising questions about this 'theory' of evolution postulated in the Age of Enlightenment of the 19th Century, is the astounding increase in scientific knowledge. Yet with all this time passing since the inception of this idea, the missing link still evades all. Indeed, the increase of knowledge has not afforded researchers any comfort levels in confirming the 'assumptions' of the evolutionary theory - and in fact some have been refuted outright. However, there appears to be a powerful insistence if you will, by many in the scientific community not to question the theory, for there is thought to be much at stake - think about the recent scam about 'global warming' broken in the recent past and how little it is communicated to the masses.
In any event, there is more than enough evidence on the worldwide web to help the questioners discover the answer for themselves. Answers here will certainly be skewed towards individual bias - just human nature. In the early 1st Century though, this question was also presented by the intelligensia and this is one of the Scriptural replies from the Apostle Paul to the Gentiles at Rome:
Romans 1:20 New King James Version (NKJV)
20 For since the creation of the world His invisible attributes are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even His eternal power and Godhead, so that they are without excuse,
Evolution is scientific fact. Creation is religious faith masquerading as real science.
They do not believe in evolution; only creation.
Norman D. Newell has written: 'Creation and evolution' -- subject(s): Evolution, Creation
creation because you need something to evolve
similarities
Fundamentalists are at odds with the teaching of evolution because they believe it is not compatible with the teaching of creation. They believe the Bible teaches creation.
The theory of organic evolution posits that species change over time through the process of natural selection, while special creation holds that species were individually created by a divine being and do not change over time. Evolution is supported by extensive scientific evidence, while special creation is a belief based on religious or philosophical perspectives.
Frank Lewis Marsh has written: 'Evolution, creation and science' -- subject(s): Religion and science, Evolution, Creation
Talk origins are a discussion group concerning the origins of life and evolution. It is usually used to start discussions between those who believe in creation and those who believe in evolution.
There is no science about creation. Creation is an unfounded myth with absolutely no evidence to support it. Try asking about evolution instead.
Nevada is pretty evolution friendly when it comes to its science standards. Nevada is also one of the few states that doesn't have a big evolution-creation controversy.
G. J. Keane has written: 'Special creation rediscovered' -- subject(s): Bible and science, Christianity, Creation, Evolution, Religious aspects of Evolution 'Creation rediscovered'