Pokemon
Prosperity led to another major change in society~the development of social classes
Prosperity led to another major change in society~the development of social classes
Answer this question… It divided society into a greater number of social classes.
Social classes are hierarchical divisions in society based on factors like wealth, power, and status. In early villages, the development of social classes was largely influenced by the control of resources such as land, food surplus, and specialized skills. This led to the emergence of elites who controlled these resources, creating a stratified society.
The four broad social classes were: ruling, nobility, peasants, and slaves.
Social classes- a broad group in society having common economic, culture, or political status
People and their windows
It kept the classes the same.
It kept the classes the same.
Social classes are groups of people in a society who have similar levels of wealth, influence, and status. In early villages, factors such as agricultural surplus, specialized labor roles, and the emergence of leadership positions led to the development of social classes. This created hierarchies within societies based on individuals' access to resources and power.
A caste is any of the hereditary social classes of traditional Hindu society. An example of a caste class is the Shudra, who were the unskilled laborers.
The social classes in ancient Rome were not groups of people coming together to learn something. They were parts of society. A person's social class was determined by his/her birth.The social classes in ancient Rome were not groups of people coming together to learn something. They were parts of society. A person's social class was determined by his/her birth.The social classes in ancient Rome were not groups of people coming together to learn something. They were parts of society. A person's social class was determined by his/her birth.The social classes in ancient Rome were not groups of people coming together to learn something. They were parts of society. A person's social class was determined by his/her birth.The social classes in ancient Rome were not groups of people coming together to learn something. They were parts of society. A person's social class was determined by his/her birth.The social classes in ancient Rome were not groups of people coming together to learn something. They were parts of society. A person's social class was determined by his/her birth.The social classes in ancient Rome were not groups of people coming together to learn something. They were parts of society. A person's social class was determined by his/her birth.The social classes in ancient Rome were not groups of people coming together to learn something. They were parts of society. A person's social class was determined by his/her birth.The social classes in ancient Rome were not groups of people coming together to learn something. They were parts of society. A person's social class was determined by his/her birth.