A variety of terms, actually. Here's a few:
Agnostic
Agnostic Non-Theist
Annoying Non-Theist
Pretentious
A Know-Nothing
Silly
Pinko Commie Fascist
Mr. Grumpy Bottoms
ChiChi
Hey, you!
Moron
Confused
Inarticulate
To better answer your question, I need clarification on the question. I mean, if a person believed that mere mortals were incapable of grasping knowledge of religion, they'd have to be pretty dumb. Pretty much everyone knows something about some religion.
And if someone believed that there were a higher power preventing humans from finding out about gods and deities, well, that'd be pretty cool. I imagine this higher power and the gods must fight all the time.
There is an inherent problem with this quote as it fails to recognize that ignorance itself is a form of error. Believing in nothing does not make one closer to the truth, as understanding and knowledge are necessary to attain a better understanding of the world. It is important to seek truth, rather than settle for ignorance or incorrect beliefs.
Pleurolistic ignorance refers to the situation where each person in a group believes they have less knowledge than others, leading to a collective overestimation of individual knowledge within the group. This can hinder effective decision-making and problem-solving as individuals may not speak up due to a false perception that others know more.
Rawls
jack Taylor believes that purple best describes Shakespeare.
Faber sees himself as a disillusioned intellectual who is disillusioned by society's rejection of literature and critical thinking. He believes in the power of books to inspire critical thought and change, and aspires to protect and preserve knowledge in a society that values ignorance and conformity.
The main difference between an empiricist and a rationalist is that an empiricist believes that knowledge comes from sensory experience and observation, while a rationalist believes that knowledge comes from reason and logic.
The main difference between rationalism and empiricism is that rationalism believes that knowledge is acquired through reason and logic, while empiricism believes that knowledge is acquired through sensory experience and observation.
Socrates believes the oracle is right because he alone knows that he knows nothing, while others mistakenly believe they have wisdom. Socrates' acknowledgment of his own ignorance distinguishes him as the wisest, as he is the only one aware of the limits of his knowledge.
A Deist.
populist
A person who believes that scientific laws rather than supernatural powers govern the universe is called a naturalist.
Because what you don't know is still real anyway, so if you are not aware of it, it can hurt you. Forewarned is forearmed. Unless you are driving the train, or can contact the driver; Knowing that there is a broken bridge comming up, would be bliss compared with knowing about it and being filled with dread. That is one of the reasons as to why ignorance is blibb; otherwise its just ignorance! That can only be seen as true if everyone on that train is ignorant and "believes" that ignorance is bliss. People who do not would rather know that their lives would soon be ending. Also as you set up a situation that you believe favors you idea let us try one that favors wisdom. Say you had an argument with someone you loved, many would wish to know of the upcoming accident so that they may spend there final moment telling them how they truly feel before their end comes. The ignorant believe ignorance is bliss, The wise do not the difference being that the wise spend much more time pondering what is true. I believe this is a misconception based on the idea that knowledge increases sorrow (whether true or false), but knowledge and wisdom are not the same. One who learns may discover things that are unpleasent and wish to forget them but the wise can put them into perspective and benefit from it whether pleasant or unpleasant.