There are many different reasons why Christians are against bullying. Some of these are: Jesus stopped Peter from attacking the Judas when the Romans came to arrest Jesus from the Garden of Gethsemane shortly after the Last Supper. Jesus condemned Peters violence which shows he is against violence. Bullying always involved violence and so can never be right. It does not follow the Golden Rule. The Golden Rule is: Do unto others and you would have them do unto you. Nobody would want to be bullied, so why would you bully someone else? It does not follow situation ethics. Situation ethics means doing what you think is the most loving thing to do. All Christians try to use situation ethics in moral decision making. Bullying denies basic human rights like "You have to right to be free from harassment and discrimination." Christians believe strongly in human rights and so cannot allow bullying.
From a Christians point of view its very changing depending on what group of Christians it is you're looking at. Usually it's Catholic - strict, Evangelic - strict but bend the rules slightly and then Liberal Protestants - more free with their ideas (just to sum up because I'm not sure which of these fits with which group of Christians). Some believe that everyone deserves a second chance, maybe the first marriage didn't work out but that doesn't mean the second can't and won't as long as the people love each other. Others believe that it depends upon the situation (situation ethics) - if the partener commited adultery or passed away then perhaps it's more acceptable for the person to move on and remarry into a loving relationship. Others believe that because divorce is wrong in the eyes of God then remarriage shouldn't even be possible. It's important to remember also that Christian's believe in the idea of children being brought up into a nuclear family with a mother and father - if a remarriage would affect this then its less likely to be accepted however with the changing of the times a lot of these things are becoming more and more acceptable. It's more situation ethics than anything - if the situation is right then most Christains believe that God will accept the remarriage if the people are in love.
If Christians were able to avail themselves of a power for ethics, not available to non-Christians, then it would be reasonable to expect that Christians would live nobler lives and behave more ethically than do non-Christians. Since we know this not to be the case, the Holy Spirit can not be a genuine force for Christians to assist them in ethical living.
Ethics is just another word for "a set of moral principles". People of all religions and none have ethics. Ethics doesn't require a belief in any particular form of spirituality.
Biblical ethics refers to the moral principles and values outlined in the Bible, while Christian ethics is the application of these principles in daily living by individuals who identify as Christians. Christian ethics may also include teachings and interpretations from church leaders and traditions that go beyond what is explicitly stated in the Bible.
Different objectives. Professional ethics are how the industry, any professional industry,should operate... personal ethics are how we ourselves should operate, not only in relation to the professional world but in our own personal, and social, spaces.
A:For Christians, a promise to God is important because they believe that God holds their ultimate fate and must not be slighted by insincere promises.Even if there is no God, such a promise is a measure of a person's ethics and sincerity, and should be kept.
There should be no difference as The Bible is Christian Ethics. Unfortunately, in the new generation, very few people are practising Christians. The Holy Bible has been changed and altered many times and Christianity has split in various sects and it is difficult to know who the real Christians are.
Christian ethical thinking varies from demanding absolute obedience to word of God, to a view that there are no binding moral laws, and that everything is relative. Situation ethics is a relatively new notion that sits between those extremes.The situationist has the one law of love (agape), many general rules of wisdom (sophia) which are more or less reliable, and the particular moment of decision (kairos) "in which the responsible self in the situation decides whether the sophia can serve love there or not." According to Joseph Fletcher, who defined this principle, there is no one of the commandments which may not be broken in some situation for love's sake. He says there are four working principles of situationism: pragmatism, relativism, positivism and personalism.In situation ethics, onIy the end justifies the means, and all ethical acts are meaningless apart from either helping or hurting persons. There are no intrinsically good acts except the act of love. The aim is to bring the greatest good (Iove) to the greatest number of men. And if love and law are in conflict, Fletcher says it is the Christian's obligation to put love over the law.
Ethics is "doing the right thing." There is no rule for every possible situation that can arise. Therefore some things are done based on what you know is right.
if your asking if that's how Christians get to heaven than no, yes it is definitely something you should do but if you believe that Jesus is the son of god and you worship them, that's how you get to heaven on the contrary. doing both is necessary for the road to heaven
Laws and ethics are not fixed principles. These principles will keep changing from time to time so as to suit a particular situation in the best way possible.