Josephus does not actually prove that Jesus existed, but he is the only non-Christian first-century author who clearly accepts the word of Christians that Jesus existed. Philo of Alexandria, supposedly a near-contemporary of Jesus, never mentions him although Philo mentions every other Jewish movement of which he was aware.
The Jews and pagans were disinterested in the works of Josephus, and they were only saved because of the value placed on them by early Christians.
AnswerUnfortunately, Josephus does not prove that Jesus existed, but he does say (Antiquities Book XVIII) that he knew of Christians who believed he had once existed and who in his own day continued to worship Jesus. If the existence of Jesus as a historical person is ever to be established, this passage will at least assist in that direction.
Although disproving might be seen to be "not proving" it actually "means proving to be false"
James Chadwick's official profession was a physicist. He won the Nobel Prize after proving that the neuron existed in 1935.
Actually, there is nothing proving that she is or was dating.
Henry Cavendish was someone who speculated that it existed back in 1785, but in 1894, Lord Rayleigh and Sir William Ramsaymanaged to isolate it, proving its existence.
This 'proof' is a well known mathematical fallacy that is actually proving that: 1
First to sail around the world, proving the world was round, and not flat.
to maintain peace, security and order. it is important for moral value and proving for the changing needs of a developing community to maintain peace, security and order. it is important for moral value and proving for the changing needs of a developing community
He did. He knew it was dangerous. He was the one who took the risk.
because a model can be very useful in proving infromation when you can't actually obsever an object or process directly.
Proving the no victims were innocent
convincing enough influential people that its true! and proving it....2 VERY different things altogether..