Yes, Ezekiel is in the Septuagint. If you click on 'related links' below the link will take you to a list of books in the Septuagint and you can read them.
Correct, Judith is in the bible. The Book of Judith is a deuterocanonical book, included in the Septuagint and the Catholic and Eastern Orthodox Christian Old Testament of the Bible
The Septuagint was a Greek translation of the Hebrew Old Testament scriptures, with each book written on a separate scroll. There was no single, bound 'Bible' that could definitively identify which books were included and which were not. The apocrypha were translated into Greek and are considered to have been part of the Septuagint.
No. The Septuagint is an ancient Greek translation of the Hebrew Bible.
Jewish scholars in Alexandria translated the Hebrew Bible into Greek, a version known as the Septuagint.
It is called the Septuagint.
No, they're two different things. The Septuagint is an ancient Greek translation of the Hebrew Bible.
The Septuagint.
Lancelot Charles Lee Brenton has written: 'The Septuagint version of the Old Testament' -- subject(s): Translations into English, Bible 'The Septuagint version of the Old Testament and Apocrypha' -- subject(s): Translations into English, Bible 'The Septuagint version of the Old Testament and Apocrypha' -- subject(s): Translations into English, Bible
I don't know if this is what you mean but, It is the Septuagint (350 BC)
Catholics (there is no such thing as "Roman Catholic", that is a popular misnomer) use the complete Bible which includes the Old Testament that Jesus Christ used, the Septuagint. The Septuagint does contain the books of 1st and 2nd Maccabees but it is most certainly not called the "Maccabees Bible", just the Holy Bible or Sacred Scripture. The Orthodox Bible contains all kinds of books which were not in the Septuagint, do no, we do not use the same Bibles.
AnswerPaul worked among the Gree-speaking gentiles, so probably used the Septuagint, an early Greek translation of the Hebrew scriptures. The Septuagint should not be thought of as a bound volume, but as a group of scrolls, some of which were already considered as sacred, while other had yet to be included in the Jewish canon.