0
What else can I help you with?
When the author makes a he or she is stating something which might or might not be true. It must be argued?
When an author makes a statement, they are expressing a claim or belief that can be persuasive or informative. The statement may be based on evidence, reasoning, or personal opinion, and it leaves room for debate or disagreement. It is up to the author to effectively argue their point and provide support for their statement to convince the audience of its validity.
What two things might a Christian fear about death?
Going to hell, dying horribly in a car accident
Why is this statement incorrect death is not the end but a beginning of a new life?
some people might think it is incorrect because they think when you die that is the end
Did John Adams say this The US is in no sense founded upon the Christian doctrine?
I can not find any record that Adams made such a statement and I can not think of what might have prompted him to make such a statement even though I think he would probably agree that it is true.
Was the atomic bombing of hiroshima unjustified?
Questions like these come down to personal opinion. One might argue that it was a need, where one might argue it was a greed. There is no "correct" answer.
Something a couple might argue about when planning a vacation?
- the destination
Name something a couple might argue about when planning a vacation?
Where to go and what to do.
Something a couple might argue when planning a vacation?
Money, as always.
What people might argue against humanism?
Some people might argue against humanism by claiming that it places too much emphasis on human capabilities and ignores the significance of spirituality or transcendental experiences. Others might argue that humanism's focus on human reason and logic overlooks the emotional and intuitive aspects of being human. Critics could also argue that humanism promotes individualism over community or social responsibility.
There should be no minimum voting age.Which statement about the claim is trueA) it is defensible but not arguableB) it is both arguable and defensibleC) it is neither arguable nor defensibleD) It is arguable but not defensible?
Oh, dude, let me break it down for you. The statement "There should be no minimum voting age" is definitely arguable, like, come on, people can argue about anything these days. But is it defensible? Well, that's a whole other story. So, the answer is D) It is arguable but not defensible. Like, you can argue it all day long, but defending it might be a bit tricky.
Is Icon for Hire Christian?
No, They might be Christian but they are NOT a christian band. The lead singer has said it herself.
What might a couple argue about win planing a vaction?
where to go. when to go.what their going to do there.
