From the Position of Legality
Whether this is the "right" to religious freedom or the "rites" that accompany religious expression, the only caveat should be where this deliberately and unreasonably antagonizes those of a different religion.
In many Western countries with freedom of religion, friction exists between practitioners whose religions have tenets that bring them into conflict with others. These could include denouncing contrary views, supporting violence, or the need to proselytize and spread the faith. In the US, although it was founded as a Christian nation, no one religion is permitted to act directly against another, either in freedom of expression or freedom of speech. However, this is not always a clear point of law.
From the Position of Non-Religion
There are prominent Atheists such as Dawkins and Dennet who strongly advocate for a ceasing of religious practice worldwide. The grounds for the advocacy are the financial resources bundled up in religion, its non-scientific basis, its creation of non-necessary human divisions, and its tendency to promote tensions and warfare.
Religious freedom is typically guaranteed by laws and constitutions in many countries, ensuring that individuals have the right to practice their religion freely without discrimination or persecution. Additionally, international agreements such as the Universal Declaration of Human Rights also recognize and protect the right to religious freedom.
The First Amendment of the United States Constitution guarantees the freedom of religious beliefs and opinions. This amendment prohibits the government from establishing a national religion and protects the rights of individuals to practice their own religion or no religion at all.
He urged religious tolerance. This us acceptance of people's rights to differing religious beliefs.
In the 1600s, religious freedom varied greatly depending on the region. In some places, individuals had limited rights to practice their own religion without persecution, while in others they were expected to adhere to the official state religion. Religious conflicts and intolerance were common during this time, leading to persecution and forced conversions in some areas.
Roger Williams, a religious and political dissenter from the Massachusetts Bay Colony, founded the settlement of Providence in 1636. He sought a place where individuals could practice their beliefs freely, leading him to establish a community based on principles of religious tolerance and respect for Native American land rights.
Forced baptism in religious practices raises ethical concerns about the violation of individual autonomy and freedom of belief. It can be seen as a form of coercion and a disregard for the rights and choices of individuals. This practice may also lead to cultural and religious tensions, as well as potential psychological harm for those who are forced to undergo the ritual against their will.
Public affairs and religious liberty refer to the advocacy and protection of individuals' rights to practice their faith freely, while also respecting the laws and norms of society. Public affairs involves engaging with policymakers and the public to promote religious freedom, while religious liberty refers to the fundamental right to worship and express one's beliefs without interference or discrimination.
The Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment protects individuals' rights to practice their religion freely. However, it does not protect practices that violate criminal laws or public policies, such as polygamy or the use of illegal drugs in religious rituals. Therefore, any religious practice that conflicts with established laws may not be protected under this clause.
Religious neutrality refers to the principle that government and public institutions should remain impartial in matters of religion, neither favoring nor discriminating against any belief system. This means ensuring that policies and practices do not promote or hinder religious expression and that individuals have the freedom to practice their faith or none at all. In democratic societies, religious neutrality is often seen as essential for upholding individual rights and fostering a pluralistic environment.
No it shouldnt' be illegal as people have rights they can do what they like.
To have your own rights
Right of groups refers to the provision that the constitution has provided to a certain group. Rights of individuals on the other hand refers to the rights that the constitution has granted the individuals.