The 'First Cause Argument' is based on the biblical creation story, so it would be false logic and a circular argument then to use the creation story to support the First Cause Argument.
For more information on The Bible creation story, please visit: http://christianity.answers.com/theology/the-story-of-creation
Advocacy- Active Support or argument for a cause
The main arguments for creation include the Cosmological Argument, which posits that everything that exists has a cause; the Teleological Argument, which argues for design and purpose in the universe; and the Moral Argument, which asserts that the existence of objective moral values implies a moral creator. Other arguments include the Ontological Argument, which focuses on the nature of existence itself, and the Fine-Tuning Argument, highlighting the precise conditions necessary for life. Each of these arguments offers a different perspective on the existence of a creator or ultimate cause.
Darwin's theory of evolution contradicts the literal interpretation of creation as taken from The Bible
All results have relationships that support the creation of the result. Look up "Critical Thinking" in any search engine An Argument is one of the relationships Premise statements support the validity of the Argument Inputs and Outputs are fed into and out of Premise statements to cause a change in the desired result. This is basically how people solve problems logically, instead of instinctively. Logic versus Trial-and-Error
Dorothea Dix supported the cause of taking care of the mentally insane. Her work lead to the creation of mental asylums in America.
The theory about the first cause, known as the cosmological argument, suggests that something must have caused the existence of the universe. This "first cause" is often understood as a necessary being or God that initiated the chain of causation that led to the creation of the universe.
The cosmological argument is a type of argument for the existence of God based on the idea that the universe must have a cause that originated it. It asserts that everything that begins to exist must have a cause, and since the universe began to exist, it must also have a cause. This argument has been debated for centuries by philosophers and theologians.
The Bible was before television by many centuries, Therefore it has no teaching specifically on the subject. We must view it as a creation of mankind, imperfect, and use it where it benefits God's Kingdom, recognising that it can also be used to cause much damage.
it does not cause the creation of the ozone.
According to Quantum Physics - all things don't have a cause. However, you should look at the Cosmological Argument (also known as the First Cause Argument) if you looking on the philosophical side: http:/www.existence-of-god.com/first-cause-argument.html
not in the bible
Not really.