Ad hominem fallacy
An example of name-calling fallacy would be if someone dismissed an argument by calling the person making the argument a "liar" without providing any evidence to disprove the argument itself. This type of fallacy aims to attack the person rather than addressing the actual content of the argument.
An ad hominem fallacy is when someone attacks the person making an argument instead of addressing the argument itself. It involves criticizing the characteristics or circumstances of the individual making the argument rather than the content of the argument itself. This type of fallacy is considered a weak form of argumentation because it does not address the actual logic or evidence presented in the argument.
"Please hire me for the job; I really need the money to pay my bills."
An ad hominem fallacy, sometimes called a "genetic fallacy" or "to the person fallacy" or shorted to "ad hominem", is a kind of logical fallacy. This logical fallacy's definition is: attacking the person rather than the statements the person made.
This type of fallacy is called an ad hominem fallacy or ad hominem attack. The Latin term means "to the man" i.e. attacking the speaker rather than refuting the argument. It may also be referred to as an irrelevance.
Ad hominem
ad hominem
Straw man
Ad hominem is a Latin term meaning "to the person." It is a type of logical fallacy where an argument is rebutted by attacking the person making the argument, rather than addressing the points they are making. This type of argument is considered invalid as it does not directly address the issue at hand.
The naturalist fallacy.
A logical fallacy that diverts listeners or readers from the real issue to an unrelated matter is referred to as a red herring.
A guilt trip fallacy occurs when someone manipulates another's emotions, especially guilt, to win an argument or persuade them to take a particular action. Rather than appealing to reason or evidence, this fallacy relies on exploiting the feelings of the other person to achieve a desired outcome. It can be a form of emotional manipulation that undermines logical discourse.