Sometimes we can establish that an interpolation has occurred because the text is missing from the earliest manuscripts available to us, or because some manuscripts use one version, while other manuscripts use a different version of the text. A well-known example is the ending of Mark's Gospel. In the earliest manuscripts known to us, the gospel ends at verse 16:8, when the women fled from the tomb and told no one what they had seen. However, there are two known interpolated endings to Mark, known as the "short ending" and the "long ending". The ending used in modern Bibles is the "long ending", but both Jerome and Eusebius stated that the verses were not in the oldest copies of the gospel that they were acquainted with.
Sometimes interpolations are reasonably clear, but often it is necessary to deduce that an interpolation may have occurred. An example of an implied interpolation occurs in 1 Cor 15:3-8. An analysis begins with Irenaeus, arguing with the followers of Marcion who said that "Paul alone knew the truth and to him alone the mystery [of the resurrection] was manifested by revelation". He said that Paul himself maintained that "the same God worked in himself and Peter" (Against the Heresies 3:13). His explanation would have been more compelling had he used the passage in 1 Cor 15:3-8, yet he did not. For this reason, Ellegard and others suggest the possibility that 1 Cor 15:3-8 may be an interpolation that did not exist in the version of 1 Corinthians that Irenaeus knew.
In fact, of the epistles nominally attributed to St Paul (Romans, 1 Corinthians, 2 Corinthians, Galatians, Ephesians, Philippians, Colossians, 1 Thessalonians, 2 Thessalonians, 1 Timothy, 2 Timothy, Titus and Philemon) many liberal Christian scholars now accept only Romans, 1 Corinthians, 2 Corinthians, Philemon, Galatians, Philippians and 1 Thessalonians as genuine. A.Q. Morton goes further, having carried out a computer analysis of the epistles attributed to Paul and found that only Romans, 1 and 2 Corinthians, and Philemon contain exactly the same writing style as Galatians. The remainder of these epistles are considered not just to have been intentionally changed, but entirely unknown to St Paul.
Another example is in 1 John 5:7: "For there are three that bear record in heaven, the Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost: and these three are one."
This has has long been known not to be original. It was never in the Greek manuscripts, but appeared in the Latin translation of the fifth century, after the Trinity doctrine had been accepted.
Certain scholars believe that the story of the adulterous woman in John 7:53-8:11 was inserted later, not part of the original gospel. Additionally, the ending of Mark (Mark 16:9-20) is thought to have been added by later scribes as it differs in style and content from the rest of the Gospel.
He was born in a Mormon family, but later he believed in the catholic/christian god, but I don't really know if he officially changed of religion. He has stated in interviews that he is not religious, but I don't know for sure.
Saint Patrick changed his name from Maewyn Succat to Patrick when he became a priest, as it was customary for priests to take on a new name to symbolize their new spiritual identity. Patrick is the name by which he is most commonly known.
There is no record of St. Patrick's name being changed. Patrick was his given name, which he kept throughout his life as a Christian missionary in Ireland.
Simon was given the name Peter by Jesus, which means "rock" in Greek. This name change symbolized Peter's role as the foundation of the Christian church, as Jesus told him, "on this rock I will build my church." Peter's leadership and faith played a pivotal role in the early Christian community.
The Crusades were fought over the control of Jerusalem, which was considered a holy site for Christians, Muslims, and Jews. The city changed hands multiple times between Christian and Muslim forces during the Crusades.
He was first admitted to Briarcrest Christian School, and later adopted by the Tuohy family.
all people have, for the better or worse, intentionally or not
He became a christian
Not necessarily Nope, it is an individual choice. What is a Christian? Now days that has changed. A christian is not necessarily a follower of Jesus. The question should be Do you follow Jesus?
Before Paul became a Christian he was called Saul. When he became a Christian his name was changed from Saul to Paul
Easy - a newborn Christian is someone who has repented their sins....and asked Christ into their life...and has changed their life for the better
Saint Patrick changed his name from Maewyn Succat to Patrick when he became a priest, as it was customary for priests to take on a new name to symbolize their new spiritual identity. Patrick is the name by which he is most commonly known.
Saul's name before becoming a Christian was Saul. Afterwards he changed it to Paul.
After he changed to a christian Paul helped people become christians
Saul changed his name to Paul.
Cary Christian School's motto is 'Ad maiorem Dei gloriam'.
As a Christian, my life has totally changed. I don't have to be as dependent on myself and I have heaven to look forward to after I die