That man is a product of creation makes more sense than any other theory of the origin of man, e.g. evolution. The first book of the Holy Scriptures tells us that God created the first man, Adam. Genesis 1:1 states: "In [the] beginning God created the heavens and the earth." After the Grand Creator made all the necessities to support life he created man. The account of Genesis continues: "And God went on to say: "Let us make man in our image, according to our likeness, and let them have in subjection the fish of the sea and the flying creatures of the heavens and the domestic animals and all the earth and every moving animal that is moving upon the earth." And God proceeded to create the man in his image, in God's image he created him; male and female he created them. Further, God blessed them and God said to them: "Be fruitful and become many and fill the earth and subdue it, and have in subjection the fish of the sea and the flying creatures of the heavens and every living creature that is moving upon the earth." So here is the most satisfying explanation of man's origin. Hebrews 3:4 puts it simply: "Of course, every house is constructed by someone, but he that constructed all things is God".
Many religions had to come to grips with the fact that the biblical creation story could not possible be anything more than metaphor. Some religious sects refuse to consider the overwhelming evidence amassed against their ideological positions and remain in denial of the truth.
Darwins work on his theory of Evolution by means of Natural Selection had an impact on religion because it proved the creation story of the 3 main monotheistic religions false. It proved the creation story false because it showed that not all life had just been planted on Earth all at once by a creator, but that live began about 3.5 billion years ago and has been constantly evolving by means of Natural Selection to this day. The evidence is so overwhelming for evolution, that most followers of these religions now accept that their creation story was not factual.
There are different responses.Some refuse to believe the evidence, or believe only what suits them. Others attempt to put forward pseudo-scientific explanations in an attempt to discredit the scientific explanations.Perhaps a majority accept the scientific evidence and adjust their religious views of the world accordingly. For example in 2006, the General Convention of the Episcopal Church affirmed, via Resolution A129, that "the theory of evolution provides a fruitful and unifying scientific explanation for the emergence of life on earth, that many theological interpretations of origins can readily embrace an evolutionary outlook, and that an acceptance of evolution is entirely compatible with an authentic and living Christian faith." This is a worldview that accepts scientific facts and religious belief.For more information, please visit: http://christianity.answers.com/theology/the-story-of-creation
A cantata is a musical composition for voices and instruments, often with a religious or sacred text. It is typically performed in a church or other religious setting and is composed to convey a religious message or story through music. Cantatas can vary in length and complexity, but they all share the common theme of religious or sacred content.
Creationism is usually associated with a belief that the world was created only a few thousand years ago, much as it is today, and that evolution played no part. This belief is not universally held by all Christians.Many Christians, while believing that God created the universe at some stage in the past, do accept that the world is billions of years old and that evolution resulted in the development of all living things. Even the Catholic Church has moved towards this position:Pope Pius XII stated in his encyclical Humani Generis (1950) that there was no opposition between evolution and the doctrine of the faith and that he considered the doctrine of "evolutionism" a serious hypothesis, worthy of investigation and in-depth study equal to that of the opposing hypothesis;Pope John Paul II, in an address to the Pontifical Academy of Sciences (1996), said that new knowledge has led to the recognition of the theory of evolution as more than a hypothesis;Pope Benedict has refused to endorse "intelligent design" theories, instead backing "theistic evolution" which considers that God created life through evolution with no clash between religion and science.For more information, please visit: http://christianity.answers.com/theology/the-story-of-creation
Darwin's Theory of Evolution challenged religious beliefs by proposing that species change over time through natural selection, rather than being created in their current form by a divine being. This challenged the traditional belief in a literal interpretation of the creation story in religious texts, leading to conflicts between scientific and religious explanations for the origin of life.
1. Evolution theory 2. Creation theory 3. Big-bang theory
Many religions had to come to grips with the fact that the biblical creation story could not possible be anything more than metaphor. Some religious sects refuse to consider the overwhelming evidence amassed against their ideological positions and remain in denial of the truth.
It appears that evolution is not disputed because it is obviously in error - if it were, then scientists would have abandoned the theory long ago. It is disputed because some see the Theory of Evolution as inconsistent with a literal reading of the Bible and thus likely to undermine faith. For more information, please visit: http://christianity.answers.com/theology/the-story-of-creation
Evolution, the change in allele frequency over time in a population of organisms is a fact and is only controversial among a vanishingly few ideologues and practically no scientists. The theory of evolution by natural selection is supported by over 95% of all scientists and is not controversial among the scientific community because it has been observed and tested for 150 years. There are some religious ideologues who can not accept the evidences that refute their creation story, so they make evolutionary theory only controversial politically.
Evolution, the change in allele frequency over time in a population of organisms is a fact and is only controversial among a vanishingly few ideologues and practically no scientists. The theory of evolution by natural selection is supported by over 95% of all scientists and is not controversial among the scientific community because it has been observed and tested for 150 years. There are some religious ideologues who can not accept the evidences that refute their creation story, so they make evolutionary theory only controversial politically.
They were shocked by it. They were unsure about the way that Darwins theory of evolution was put across within the novella.
Some true statements about evolution:Evolution is the best explanation we have for the origin of speciesEvolution is accepted by scientists as factThe Theory of Evolution has contributed enormously to the understanding of BiologyThe Theory of Evolution has been used successfully to predict the discovery of an ancient speciesFor more information, please visit: http://christianity.answers.com/theology/the-story-of-creation
No. This is an apocryphal tale that many fundamentalists wish to believe but there is not a shred of evidence supporting this story and much evidence, especially from Darwin's personal correspondence and the words of his family, that refute this libel.
Darwins work on his theory of Evolution by means of Natural Selection had an impact on religion because it proved the creation story of the 3 main monotheistic religions false. It proved the creation story false because it showed that not all life had just been planted on Earth all at once by a creator, but that live began about 3.5 billion years ago and has been constantly evolving by means of Natural Selection to this day. The evidence is so overwhelming for evolution, that most followers of these religions now accept that their creation story was not factual.
Most of us accept the theory of Evolution. The story of Adam and Eve is a metaphor intended to remind us that we are all of one family.
The term 'Theistic Evolution' was used by Eugenie Scott to refer to the theological view that God creates through evolution. Theistic evolution is not a scientific theory, but a particular view about how the science of evolution could relate to religious belief and interpretation.For more information, please visit: http://christianity.answers.com/theology/the-story-of-creation