The crossing of the Jordan River, as accounted in the Book of Joshua would not have taken very long. The River itself is not powerful (aside from the fact that they crossed on dry land) and it is not terribly wide. It probably took a few hours considering how many Israelites were crossing.
Although the exact duration is not given, it was a matter of months - not more.
Commentary in Talmud Sotah 34b appears to suggest the people might have crossed over in the formation of their encampment, but there is another suggestion they crossed in single file. One commentary says they achieved the crossing by packing together into a space little more than one square kilometre and moving forward. The Talmud is a commentary on the Bible, so it should not be regarded as definitive. If the Bible is literally true, there were 600,000 fighting men, plus women, children, the elderly and infirm, plus their livestock, wagons and possessions, which suggests that a single-file crossing would be entirely impractical. Packing, say, 2.5 million people together in such a small space, even if physically possible, would have resulted in numerous deaths and injuries, so we can also rule this out.In the melee that would no doubt have ensued, we could imagine 100 men crossing at a time, spread out along the reach of the river, each assisting his womenfolk and children in the crossing. If the next 100 followed down the river banks just one minute later, then 6000 family groups would cross per hour. With no mishaps and crossing throughout day and night, the people could be across in a little over 4 days.The Book of Joshua is a stirring story of conquest, but almost all modern scholars believe the Israelites never invaded Canaan or conquered the cities. The Israelites did not need to cross the River Jordan to invade the land of the Canaanites, because they were already there: the evidence is of peaceful, internal migration rather than of conquest. This is consistent with the modern scholarly consensus that the Israelites were never in Egypt and that there never was an Exodus from Egypt as described in the Bible.
The Bible does not really this question, although the story implies a fairly quick passage. But we can do some calculations to determine how long it would have taken.The Bible says that there were 600,000 fighting men. Scholars calculate that this would mean at least 2.5 million Israelites, including women, children, priests and the elderly. The Bible also says that the Israelites had cattle, which would also have been driven across.Travelling several persons abreast, we could start by assuming that on average one person crossed every second, day and night for twenty four hours a day. Two and a half million people would take up to 29 days to cross.
The Saint John River is approximately 673 kilometers (418 miles) long, making it the second longest river in Eastern Canada. It flows through the provinces of Quebec, New Brunswick, and Maine in the United States.
Connecticut was named after the Connecticut River, which was named by Dutch explorer Adriaen Block in the early 1600s. The name "Connecticut" is believed to come from the Native American word "quinetucket," meaning "beside the long tidal river."
The Jordan River is 251 kilometres (156 miles) long.
Although the exact duration is not given, it was a matter of months - not more.
The Jordan River is a 251-kilometre-long river in West Asia flowing to the Dead Sea.
The Jordan River is approximately 251 kilometers (156 miles) long. It flows from its source at the Anti-Lebanon mountains, through the Sea of Galilee, and ultimately drains into the Dead Sea. The river serves as a significant geographical and historical boundary, particularly between Israel and Jordan.
From Rila mountain crossing the full length of Bulgaria to be poured in BLACK SEA. Longest river in Bulgaria
dont know about 4 hours probably
Answer 1They didn't. The Jordan River is on the eastern border of Israel. The Ancient Hebrews entered from the South, through the desert.(Unless you are talking about Abraham's family, in which case, they did come from the East, but the Torah doesn't mention anything about how they crossed the river).Answer 2Although the Israelites entered what is today Israel through the Negev desert, they actually crossed into what is today Jordan and then crossed over the Jordan from the east. (This is the "long-way 'round".) This is recounted in the early part of the Book of Joshua and they crossed on dry land, similar to the crossing of the Reed Sea.As concerns Abraham's entry into Canaan, it is presumed that he entered Canaan via Lebanon and therefore would have been consistently west of the Jordan River.
The Jordan River is significantly smaller in size compared to the Nile River. The Jordan River is approximately 156 miles long, while the Nile River is the longest river in the world, stretching over 4,100 miles. Additionally, the Jordan River flows through the Jordan Rift Valley, while the Nile River flows through multiple countries including Egypt, Sudan, Ethiopia, and Uganda. The Jordan River is also known for its religious significance in Christianity, Judaism, and Islam, while the Nile River has been historically crucial for agriculture and civilization in ancient Egypt.
Tradition states that the river was crossed in the course of a few hours at most.
According to local history it has Anglo Saxon decent from Long Ford (a shallow river easily crossed on foot) but probably Norman influences changed it to Langford. But it is English. If it is a surname it is probably John Of Langford etc.. but long story short it is English. There is a village called Langford in Bedfordshire.
Night time generally starts from 7 PM... It probably goes to 3-5 AM
Hundreds, the Thames is a long river and flows through many towns and villages. There are 107 bridges from source to the Thames mouth