answersLogoWhite

0

well people belive in god so they can all go to war saying there imaginary friend is better. However without belief in something you will fall for anything!

User Avatar

Wiki User

15y ago

What else can I help you with?

Continue Learning about Religious Studies

What theory maintains that the universe exist and appears for some reason and is an argument for the existence of god?

The theory that maintains that the universe exists for a reason and argues for the existence of God is known as the teleological argument or the argument from design. This argument posits that the intricate design and complexity observed in the universe suggest the existence of an intelligent designer, which is often equated with God.


Which abolitionist argument is most rooted in religion?

The argument that slavery is morally wrong because all individuals are equal in the eyes of God and have inherent human dignity is most rooted in religion. This perspective emphasizes the belief that all people are created in the image of God and are entitled to freedom and basic human rights.


How did William Paley prove that god existed?

William Paley's argument for the existence of God is often summarized as the "watchmaker analogy." He compares the complex design of a watch to the complexity of the universe, arguing that just as a watch must have had a designer (a watchmaker), so too must the universe have had a designer (God). Paley's argument is based on the idea that complex design implies an intelligent designer.


Which is correct - ''thank God'' or ''thanks God''?

"Thank God" is correct, both as an imperative or as an interjection. "Thanks God" is incorrect. You could say "thanks to God," but that is an unusual construct.


What side did God take Adam's rib from?

im not sure but i think its his left side Genesis 2:21 -And the Lord God caused a deep sleep to fall on Adam, and he slept; and He took one of his ribs, and closed up the flesh in its place. it waz his right side

Related Questions

What in your own words was Thomas Aquinas' argument for the existence of god?

here be me thomas aquinas own argument to say that god is real i can prove bye the holy spirit


Whose side is god on?

the real God is on everones


In the is there a god argument which side of the argument has more evidence to support it?

No, there is no logical argument that is more supported or logically sound than an atheist's. If there was, it likely would be well known.


What are the main arguments for whether god is real and why?

There are many kinds of arguments supporting God's existence but they are all not necessary because I am a living evidence for the existence of God. If you know me, you will understand. I am surrounded by lot of negative forces (spirits). I am scolding them daily. I think most of the people or almost all people are hearing my voices as well as evil spirits’ voices everyday. At present all creatures including human beings are living in a miraculous era of God. This is a temporary miracle of God. I am connected to all creatures including human beings and spirits internally by God since year 1950 but I am not a God. I think that all human beings can see what I see, can hear what I hear and even know my thoughts. But thoughts are complicated matter. It needs an explanation. The people who have born in this era cannot realize this miracle because they have born with it. An old brave and honest gentleman aged 85 can explain about this miracle. God never bothers whether people believe in him or not. God's direct intervention in individuals' affairs is very rare. God doesn't watch each and every human being at the same time and cannot live with each and everyone to guide them. These works are done by the spirits. God had created different kinds of spirits for various purposes. He had made the spirits to watch, guide and determine the destiny of the human beings from their daily activities, talks and thoughts too. Your past determines your present and your present determines your future. God has given freewill to all creatures including human beings. According to this, all human beings have all right to live a life as they wish. But if it happens to be bad and hurts someone, they have to face the consequences. These consequences are created by spirits. It's a natural system. After death no one lives in any form. Heaven and hell are only for spirits, not for human beings. God is a mystery even to the spirits. Spirits are not eternal beings but their lifetime is long. Spirits are separate elements. A human being during his/her lifetime is living with many spirits which have joined one by one since birth. They are knowledge, skills, feelings, emotions, instincts, interests and everything. Further there will be always some spirits with you on behalf of your parents, friends, relatives and Gods you believe. Only these spirits make you remember them in a certain situations. All of these spirits are your consciousnesses and memories. Even thoughts are not your own. For example, when you want to take a decision on a subject, one after another the spirits think and you just listen, choose or reject the ideas which they transmit to your mind through your brain in the form of thoughts. A mind is a group/formation of many spirits which have joined one by one since birth. A mind is just like a computer's mind. After the computer is completely destroyed you will not get its mind. The same is the case with the human beings. A brain is a device used by the spirits to control the body and mind. (A senior spirit or a chief can control other spirits) A human being doesn't have a spiritual body. Soul is an energy needed for the functionality of a body. It is not a spirit or anything else. A body's functionality is based on the auto mechanism. After death all spirits which accompanied a person quit and go to different places searching new bodies. No one lives after death in any form. All human beings are just robots made of flesh and bones and toys of the spirits for their games.


How can you prove to your friend that God is the real god?

Numerous arguments have been put forward and tested over the centuries, to prove that God is real. In each case and in each class of such arguments, there have been found to be fatal flaws in the argument. It is not possible to prove that God is real. You have your faith and your friend believes otherwise.


Is really god and ghosts are real?

yes both of them are real and still are


Who is your real dad god or your other dad?

both


What are the Teleological and cosmological arguments?

Both are arguments for the existence of god. They are both similar. The teleological argument, or argument from design posits that there is a god or designer based on the appearance of complexity, order, and design in nature. The argument is usually structured as follows: 1) Complexity implies a designer. 2) The universe is highly complex. 3) Therefore, the universe must have a designer. The cosmological argument, or first cause argument states that god must exist as a first cause to the universe. It is usually structured as follows: 1) Whatever exists has a cause. 2) The universe exists. 3) Therefore the universe had a cause.


What argument exists for Jesus being the son of God?

The argument for Jesus being the Son of God is that the Bible says so. If there is any doubt as to the reliability of the Bible, then there is no support for the argument that Jesus is the Son of God.


What is the conclusion to St Anselm's Ontological Argument for the existence of God?

St. Anselm's Ontological Argument concludes that God, defined as "that than which nothing greater can be conceived," must exist in reality and not just in the mind. Anselm argues that if God exists only in the understanding, then a greater being could be conceived to exist in reality, which contradicts the definition of God. Therefore, God must exist in both the mind and in reality, affirming His existence. This argument emphasizes the necessity of God's existence based on the very concept of God itself.


What is an argument from design?

An argument from design is a theological term for a teleological argument - an argument for the existence of God, such that because nature is orderly, it is evidence of a designer.


Is the ontological argument deductive or inductive?

The ontological argument is a deductive argument. It aims to prove the existence of God based on the concept of God as a necessary being. It uses logical reasoning to demonstrate that the existence of God is a necessary consequence of the definition of God as a perfect being.