Other answers from our community:
The short answer to this question is 'No'. Why? - They don't WANT to.
Since the majority of eminent historians, scholars, etc are not Christian they cannot be expected to find evidence to support their non-belief; since this majority of eminent historians, scholars, etc don't believe The Bible, they cannot be expected to find evidence to support the Bible; and facts are massaged to fit , and if they don't fit they are ignored.
(For example, they do not believe the original archaeological findings of the 'dig' at the site of ancient Jericho that the walls did fall down flat , that there was one section that didn't, and that it occurred at such-and-such a time. It was re-dated and 'spin-doctored' into a later date and there was no possible correlation with the Biblical facts.)
To answer the question, 'Yes, there is factual evidence that the Exodus occurred, but it is not accepted by the majority ( and especially among the christians) to avoid rocking the boat and having to accept that the Bible just might be true.'
Yes, there is plenty of evidence.
They look in the wrong time-frame for the Exodus event and so fail to find the evidence which is there. the Bible clearly indicates around 1440 BC for the Exodus (based on 1 Kings 6:1) with a conquest around 1400 BC. Yet most scholars look around 1230-50 BC and so find no evidence since the few cities that were destroyed (after all, they did want to live in them if they could) are no longer there to be found. The key words here are "majority of eminent..."
The answer to hour question is; there's no evidence accepted by majority of eminent (etc) that the Exodus actually happened.
The King James Bible, also known as the Authorized Version, was written by a team of scholars and translators commissioned by King James I of England and first published in 1611. It was a revision of earlier English translations of the Bible.
A:The term 'Pauline epistles' is applied to those epistles that scholars generally agree were actually written by the apostle Paul. The term 'non-Pauline epistles' is applied to those epistles that scholars generally agree were not actually written by the apostle Paul, although the authors wrote in his name. Another term for 'non-Pauline epistles' is 'pseudo-Pauline epistles'.The epistles almost universally regarded as having been written by Paul are: Romans, 1 Corinthians, 2 Corinthians, Philemon, Galatians, Philippians and1 Thessalonians. The following epistles are regarded by the majority of scholars as non-Pauline: Ephesians, Colossians, 2 Thessalonians, 1 Timothy, 2 Timothy and Titus.
A:The Book of Jonah places Jonah in the northern kingdom of Israel, perhaps in the eighth century BCE. Scholars continue to debate whether the story was actually written in Israel or, much later (perhaps even after the Babylonian Exile), in the southern kingdom of Judah.
A:The biblical reason for this is that God promised the land of the Canaanites to their forebears. The real reason is surprising! Archaeologists and scholars have ascertained that the Israelites were actually Canaanites themselves, and had migrated from the region of the rich coastal cities, to settle peacefully in the hitherto sparsely populated hinterland - they had not come out of Egypt to invade and conquer the Canaanites at all. Centuries later, after the Hebrew people had long forgotten their real origins, they created legends of their supposed ancestors, their sojourn in Egypt and the conquest of Canaan, just as this tradition says that God told them.
A:Thirteen epistles are traditionally attributed to St. Paul. The consensus of scholars is that he actually wrote 7 of these: Romans, 1 Corinthians, 2 Corinthians, Philemon, Galatians, Philippians and 1 Thessalonians. He did not write 6 letters attributed to him: Ephesians, Colossians, 2 Thessalonians, 1 Timothy, 2 Timothy and Titus, which are termed the pseudo-Pauline epistles, as they were written in Paul's name.
Generally, historians do not actually dig in the ground for artifacts. Archeologists do that and inform historians of the their findings.
The site has been found and explored by archaeologists.
The site has been found and explored by archaeologists.
The site has been found and explored by archaeologists.
Archaeologists have found the site, and have found Viking items there.
Scholars believed that the so-called Step Pyramid of Djoser was actually just a series of stacked MASTABAS.
Archaeologists have found the site, and have found Viking items there.
AnswerThe legendary kingdom of David and Solomon is called Israel.According to the Bible, David and Solomon greatly expanded the kingdom into coastal Canaan and what are now southern Syria and western Jordan. This was the view long held by biblical archaeologists, who accepted the biblical dates for the archaeological evidence they found. However, some modern archaeologists have determined that the brief expansion of Israel actually occurred much later, under King Ahab. Biblical scholars dispute the historicity of both David and Solomon, although there is some circumstantial evidence that there may have been a leader called David, or at least the people of Judah believed there had been.
830
Some historians believe that after the conquering of Constantinople large amounts of greek scholars fled West particularly to Italy where they transfered valuable texts and information this may have given the Renaissance further impetus for growth inb the intellectual field
some famous people that actually discovered stuff is William von snozelsnot if you don't believe me search it up on Google
Some historians feel that the Hebrews actually were a Canaanite tribe. However, Jewish tradition holds that they are two separate groups.