The Church
win allies who would support him in times of need, maintain a strong standing army and control over valuable resources, and ensure the loyalty of his subjects through effective governance and administration.
Feudalism was characterized by a hierarchical social structure where land was held by lords in exchange for military service from vassals or peasants. It was a decentralized system of government where political power and authority were fragmented among various nobles and local rulers.
A nonreligious reason for the Crusades was the desire for political power and expansion of territories. Many leaders and nobles saw the Crusades as an opportunity to gain wealth and land, increase their influence, and consolidate their power in the region. Economic motivations, such as trade opportunities and access to resources, also played a significant role in the Crusades.
A secular lord is a ruler or noble who exercises power and authority over a territory without any formal religious affiliation. They derive their authority from worldly or political sources rather than religious institutions.
In Sikhism, the horse symbolizes power, grace, and freedom and is considered a noble creature. Horses play a significant role in Sikh history and are often depicted in art and literature within the faith.
Religion played a significant role in reinforcing the social hierarchy of feudalism by legitimizing the power of monarchs and nobles through divine right. The Catholic Church provided stability and moral guidance in this system through the concept of the "Great Chain of Being." Additionally, religious institutions often owned vast amounts of land and wielded considerable political influence in the feudal system.
other nobles and the church
they are noble, richer, better, stronger in power, owner of lands, better then peasants.
The central government grew weaker and the noble families grew stronger and as the noble families(daimyos) grew power the law of the central government slowly lost its power so the emperor lost it power.
Aristocrocies came to represent city-state's noble class. Little by little, the nobles gained more land and power. By about 700 B.C. nobles in many Greek city-states had overthrown their kings and had taken power themselves.
Kings and Nobles
The government began to run out of money. It also began to lose control over large landholders. As the central government grew weaker, noble families gained power.Hope this helped._. From:<<>>Lov is blood<<>>
A Mediaval noble was kind of like a sub-king. The overall king had full power of the land, but a king usually had so much land that he needed help ruling it. He would appoint nobles to rule a small part of his land, pay him taxes, and provide him with his services. If the noble was not loyal to the king, he would take away his power to rule.
He inherited the throne of Russia from his father, Czar Alexis I, and ruled jointly with his sickly brother Ivan until Ivan died. do you know how he limited the power of the nobles? or how any other absolutism rulers limited the power of nobles?
During the A.D. 800s, this shift of power from kings to nobles led to new order known as feudalism. Under feudalism, landowning nobles governed and also protected the people in return for services,such as fighting in a noble's army or farming the lands.
The pharaohs not only wanted more power they knew that the noble will probably support them back. The pharaohs knew that they couldn't control all the peasant, merchants and craftsmen all by themselves so they tried to establish good relationship with the nobles who could at like overseers for the kingdom.
A serf was a peasant who worked on a noble's land in exchange for protection and the use of land. The noble owned the land and had power and authority over the serfs who lived and worked on it.
The tzar's were nobles up until 1917 that held the power in Russia.