I Corinthians 7:1-7 seems to indicate that he was not married:
7 Now for the matters you wrote about: It is good for a man not to marry.a 2 But since there is so much immorality, each man should have his own wife, and each woman her own husband. 3 The husband should fulfill his marital duty to his wife, and likewise the wife to her husband. 4 The wife's body does not belong to her alone but also to her husband. In the same way, the husband's body does not belong to him alone but also to his wife. 5 Do not deprive each other except by mutual consent and for a time, so that you may devote yourselves to prayer. Then come together again so that Satan will not tempt you because of your lack of self-control. 6 I say this as a concession, not as a command. 7 I wish that all men were as I am. But each man has his own gift from God; one has this gift, another has that.
More information:
1 Corinthians 7 must be understood in light of 1 Corinthians 9, where verses 1-6 suggest just as strongly that Paul was, indeed, married, as would be expected of a Pharisee in the 1st Century.
1Am I not free? Am I not an apostle? Have I not seen Jesus our Lord? Are you not the result of my work in the Lord?2Even though I may not be an apostle to others, surely I am to you! For you are the seal of my apostleship in the Lord.
3This is my defense to those who sit in judgment on me. 4Don't we have the right to food and drink? 5Don't we have the right to take a believing wife along with us, as do the other apostles and the Lord's brothers and Cephas? 6Or is it only I and Barnabas who must work for a living? [New International Version.]
Another perspective:Taking into account all the applicable New Testament references, a reasonable conclusion (which also helps explain any seeming ambiguity) is that Paul (Saul) had been married, and was a widower by the time he wrote his epistles. However, the most honest (if unsatisfactory) answer is that scripture just doesn't indicate one way or the other with absolute certainty.Saul was born and raised in Tarsus, a city in the Roman province of Cilicia, which is in modern-day Turkey.
No, Paul of Samosata and Paul Saul of Tarsus are not the same person. Paul of Samosata was a bishop of Antioch in the 3rd century who held unorthodox views on the nature of Jesus, while Paul of Tarsus, known as Saint Paul, was an apostle and early Christian missionary who wrote many of the New Testament letters.
Saul, later known as Paul, was from Tarsus, a city in modern-day Turkey. He was a Roman citizen, a Jew, and a prominent figure in the early Christian church.
After his conversion, Saul of Tarsus, who later became known as the apostle Paul, dedicated his life to preaching the teachings of Jesus Christ. He traveled extensively, establishing churches and spreading the message of Christianity throughout the Roman Empire. He wrote many of the letters, or epistles, that are now part of the New Testament.
St. Peter, also known as Cephas, was one of the twelve apostles chosen by Jesus. He is considered the first pope of the Catholic Church. St. Paul, originally known as Saul of Tarsus, was a prominent early Christian missionary and theologian who converted to Christianity after encountering Jesus on the road to Damascus.
Modern day Turkey .
Tarsus
Saul was born and raised in Tarsus, a city in the Roman province of Cilicia, which is in modern-day Turkey.
Paul was the new name of Saul of Tarsus.
Yes
yes
If you ask on Saul the apostle then it is Tarsus , in Asia Minor today's Turkey.
Saint Paul was formerly known as Saul of Tarsus.
SAul of Tarsus?
A. Layman has written: 'Saul Of Tarsus'
Saul being a Pharisee was probably married knowing that to be a Pharisee it was important to be married and believe in family, however, this is not a prov-en fact. And whether or not Paul would have had any children is unlikely noting that there is no reference to any of his children or lineage documented at all.
Saul of Tarsus