Was enoch black or white

Answer 1

Judging from biblical history, Enoch was NOT caucasian. Enoch is a black African. THere was three sons. HAm SHem and JAphat. JAphat is white, Shem is black, Ham is black. Hamites are Canaanites, Cushites which are Ethiopians, Mizraim, and Phut.

Genesis 10:6-9

Cushites are Ethiopians. Ethiopians ARE BLACK.

Answer 2

What a worthless question and one designed to divide. People leap to the wrong conclusion about the descendants of Cainan. Some had skin as black as coal, and others had skin that was not black but a reddish light brown to a true red brown. See Native American Indians as an example here. If you look at King David and Solomon, they are described as also having a reddish skin color similar to what we see in full-blood Native Americans today. It is a unique color that survived through time on the American continent. The current Palestinians are very much direct descendants of Cain and are the cursed ones that Noah was referring to. While those who are black as midnight in the south of the Sahara are not cursed and can not be cursed.

People are ignorant because they can not comprehend what The Bible actually relayed about Cainan and why he was cursed. It is not what is commonly taught. In fact, I have only heard one preacher some 50 years ago that got it right. Ham basically took advantage of his mother when Noah was drunk. If you read what the bible calls uncovered nakedness, it defines it as to the wife of the named person taken in nakedness. If you look at Cain's family tree he is not listed like all the others because he is a product of such relations. ( can not use the R Ape or In ce st word) Notice that Ham did the deed but did not get cursed rather the offspring of Ham to the deed did get cursed.

This is why Cainan is cursed because he was product of close family member and those born from it carry a specific type of curse that manifests in different ways. The more inbred the more the curse of it becomes more exposed visually and in more exaggerated ways. Although the genetic issue may not be seen visually in some people but it does exist. This is why there are laws around the world today about marriage to close family members. The offspring would have issues and become a burden on the parents and society. The most often defect is insanity, Bipolar and other mental issues. Not that everyone who has those is a product of inbreeding. Though these traits are very much passed down unto the 4th generation readily before it can be cleared up through diversity in the genetics. It is why certain families and regions are historically known for these types of problems. It is a science medical fact!

As to Enoch, he would look like a full blooded Native American in his reddish skin. His grandson Noah was white as you could get including White hair and blue eyes. People often forget that parts of Northwest Africa there is white people who have been there since before even Egypt was founded. This is a known fact and can not be disputed though many will try and expose their sheer ignorance before the world.

I do not understand the black theology biblical movement to claim all early persons listed in the bible as being black in skin color despite pictorial proof to the contrary. It is a movement that is heretical and is insulting their own heritage. All these black theology movement people and their videos about black this and that are almost always based on untrue facts or deliberately distorted ones. While they push these untruths, they absolutely ignore the incredible history and greatness of what historic black persons have done that are true pillars of humanity. Yet, black people ignore them, curse them and reject these absolute great individuals while trying to steal other persons from history their contributions. Why try to tear down what others have done because of color of skin. It is stupidity in motion. Those who view through color of skin are small or rather microscopic in intelligence. I do not care if a person is pink purple poka dot. What matters to me is what they say and what they do where I compare to see if they back each side up. Often these days they do not. People have no character, honor nor righteousness. Today, the black theology movement is doing what they despised 100 years ago. They are acting and doing what the racist did. After all, each group has there own racist. Does not matter the skin color, national origin or other regional religious context. Racists are everywhere. Black theology people are trying to out do the racists of past slave owners.

Answer 3

Enoch was neither black nor white, he was actually a biblical figure from the Book of Genesis who was said to have walked with God and then was taken up to heaven without experiencing death. So, in the grand scheme of things, his race is pretty irrelevant. But hey, good try for trying to keep things interesting!

Answer 4

Oh, dude, Enoch was neither black nor white. Enoch was a figure mentioned in the Bible who was said to be the great-grandfather of Noah. So, like, I guess you could say he was more of a biblical character than a Crayola crayon color.

Answer 5

Enoch is a figure mentioned in the Bible and other ancient texts, such as the Book of Enoch. There is no explicit description of Enoch's race or ethnicity in these texts. The focus of these texts is on Enoch's prophetic and spiritual significance rather than his physical appearance. Therefore, it is not accurate to definitively state whether Enoch was black or white based on these sources.

Answer 6

There is no definitive answer to Enoch's ethnicity as it is not mentioned in historical or biblical texts. Depictions of Enoch in various religious texts and traditions may vary.

Answer 7

Shemites are not black. Are the Israelites black? No theyre not. Theyre olive tone skin. Brown.