Paul in prison said rejoice again I say rejoice in christ in all things.
1939
This is copied from another site:http://www.gotquestions.org/apostle-Paul-married.htmlSome believe that the Apostle Paul was married because history tells us that a member of the Sanhedrin was required to be married. However, Paul never stated that he was a member of the Sanhedrin. He definitely seemed to be on the path, "I was advancing in Judaism beyond many Jews of my own age and was extremely zealous for the traditions of my fathers" (Galatians 1:14). However, Paul might not have advanced that far before He converted to Christ.Another point:The strongest New Testament evidence that Paul was a member of the Sanhedrin is his own statement recorded by Luke in Acts 26:10: "This I also did in Jerusalem, and many of the saints I shut up in prison, having received authority from the chief priests; and when they were put to death, I cast my vote against them." [NKJV]Only a member of the Sanhedrin would have "cast a vote" to have Christians put to death in Jerusalem.
I don't believe these modern terms can be applied to Paul's role in the early church. The term "pastor" typically applies to one who ministers in a local church, either as a full-time job or "on the side" so to speak. Paul was a missionary, to use a more modern term. Paul's mission was to take the gospel to the Gentiles which put him on permanent travel. I would say that today he would be referred to more as a visiting pastor, if the term pastor is to be applied.
The Bible doesn't say exactly, but we can make an educated guess if we look at the years he was preaching.He began his first missionary tour around 47-48 CE, and his third around 52-56 CE. He was imprisoned for the second time in Rome around 65 CE , where he wrote his second letter to Timothy, implying that his death was imminent (2Timothy 4:6-8), and was most likely martyred by Emperor Nero soon after.
A:Arguably, the author of Acts sought to show that Paul did not have any greater authority than did Peter. According to Acts, Paul's first miraculous cure was improbably similar to Peter's first cure. In both cases, a man who had been lame since birth was immediately cured by being commanded to stand and walk. Peter's first miracle cure was performed in the name of Jesus, at the Temple, where the faithful saw the healed beggar praising God, and was the opportunity for some outstanding proselytising. Paul's first cure was clumsy and without apparent purpose, given that Paul did not tell the man about Jesus and he was even mistaken for a pagan god.In an even more difficult challenge, Peter resurrected Tabitha, a good woman and a disciple, who was certainly dead and her body had already been washed. This miracle became known throughout Joppa and, as a result, many were converted. Paul also resuscitated a young man who foolishly fell asleep in an upper storey window and fell to the ground. There is some uncertainty as to whether the young man was really dead when Paul intervened to revive him, and the miracle did not present an opportunity to convert unbelievers.According to Acts, Peter was released from prison twice by angels, who in one case accompanied Peter from the prison. There was no doubt about the extent of divine assistance Peter received in his escapes. Paul was released from prison by a timely earthquake that arguably need not have been of divine origin, and furthermore he did not make good his escape.According to Paul's own account, he took it upon himself to preach to the Gentiles and even rebuked Peter in Antioch for refusing to eat with the Gentiles. Compare this to Acts chapters 10 and 11, where Peter experienced a miraculous vision and was visited by the Holy Ghost, giving him a sign to bring Gentiles into the Church. In that account, Peter defended his actions in choosing to eat with the Gentiles and asserted that the Church must preach to the Gentiles. In the Acts account, Paul was carefully excluded from the company when these important decisions were made.St Peter and St Paul are referred together and in opposition in Acts of the Apostles in order to show second-century Christians who was really, in its author's opinion, the most important apostle.Even the passages that deal with apostles other than Peter and Paul still serve a purpose in the discussion of the two main characters. The story of the trial and stoning of Stephen, which some scholars say seems to have been derived from older material, provides an introduction to 'Saul' as the callous young man who watched the death of Stephen but was not man enough to participate, as contrasted with the great apostle who later gave his life to serve Christianity. The story that has Agabus prophesying the famine (Acts 11:28), after which the disciples determined to send relief to those who dwelt in Judea, seems carefully crafted to deny Paul any role in this important relief effort, although his own epistles suggest that he played an important part.
Many biblical scholars believe that the first missionary journey of Paul of Tarsus was to Cyprus. There is not 100% agreement with this however.
Paul himself, in his epistles, never mentioned his birthplace. The Acts of the Apostles, written some decades later, has Paul say that he was from Tarsus.
A:Acts of the Apostles describes Paul as from Tarsus, a city in Asia Minor, at verses 9:11, 21:39 and 22:3.Against this, many modern New Testament scholars say that Acts is not always reliable and is believed much too readily. In his own epistles, Paul never mentions Tarsus and does not tell us where he was from, so it is quite possible that he was not really from Tarsus.
1939
Traditionally, 2 Timothy has been believed to have been written by Paul while imprisoned in Rome. However, scholars say that both epistles addressed to Timothy are clearly from the second century, and were not written by Paul. Since they were not written by Paul, there is nothing to say they were written from prison.
A:Traditionally, 2 Timothy has been believed to have been written by Paul while imprisoned in Rome. However, scholars say that both Epistles addressed to Timothy are clearly from the second century, and were not written by Paul. Since Second Timothy was not written by Paul, there is nothing to say it was written from prison.
The Bible does not say his name, yet Paul and Silas helped him to convert to Christianity after the earthquake freed them from their prison cells
Paul worked for the lord after he was converted, whether in chains, prison, shipwrecked or in front of Roman council he spoke boldly, for example in chains and in prison. Paul says Rejoice and again I say rejoice.
Jesus of Nazareth was obviously the progenitor of the faith. He does count as a theologian. If you're looking for the next branch on the tree, I would say that it was Paul... formerly Saul of Tarsus. A good portion of the New Testament is made of Paul's correspondance on matters of faith. He clears up confusion and directs missionary work in those letters, and we still view his contributions to Christianity to be worthy of inclusion in the Christian canon, making them very important.
de la prison is how you say-[out of prison] in french for more info visit [http;//translation.imtranslator.net/translate/default.asp?loc=en and then for example it will say English to french or German to philipini and you choose ,but the top is were you write the translation and the bottom is where you get the answer to what you wrote.
Prison
The word 'prison' is 刑務所 (keimusho) in Japanese.