I'm not sure but the only the fittest survive part is evolution
Yes, a society can survive without religion as many secular societies exist today. However, religion has played a significant role in shaping societal structures, moral codes, and cultural traditions in many societies throughout history. The absence of religion may require alternative values or belief systems to create cohesion and provide meaning for individuals within a society.
Actually the main problem with the existence of evil is for certain religions to explain it: How to make the existence of evil compatible with a benevolent God?Of course, there are several different explanations for this apparent contradiction. Anyway, for non-religious people, there is no such problem to solve. Evil (bad things happening) can be explained by random chance; evil people can be explained by the desire of individuals to survive and prosper, and more in general, by psychology. Only in the case of believing in a religion, does the problem arise: How can God ALLOW such-and-such things to happen?
Pop-culture did not start in the conventional sense, it describes the self-realization of popular trends in society and is not a tangible item. There is no true start to pop-culture as humans have always possessed self-awareness since the dawn of man.
it is - album - I WILL SURVIVE - think - about 1979
in England, they faced persecution from the church. when they moved to the new world, they faced all the same problems that early American settlers faced: lack of food, hard living conditions, threat of attack from Indian groups, harsh winters, being cut off from most other people. they actually did much better than most other American colonists, though. they were determined to show the world what a true christian society would look like, and they planned their move to America much better than most groups of early colonists.
Social Darwinism
It's a struggle for existence because the animals have to do many things to survive
Social Darwinism.
This belief is known as social Darwinism, which applies theories of natural selection to society. It suggests that competition and survival of the fittest should be encouraged in order to improve society and promote progress. However, this perspective has been criticized for justifying inequality and disregarding the well-being of marginalized populations.
The fittest is the organism that can survive where others cannot dare survive.
Social Darwinism
Natural selection conceived of as a struggle for life in which only those organisms best adapted to existing conditions are able to survive and reproduce.
To pit it in a more accurate form; the theory of evolution by natural selection. Not a belief, a theory in the scientific sense.
Survival of the fittest
"Survival of the fittest" is a concept from evolutionary theory, suggesting that organisms best adapted to their environment are more likely to survive and reproduce. It does not necessarily mean the strongest or fastest will survive, but rather those most suited to their specific circumstances.
In Darwin's theory of evolution, over-reproduction means that organisms tend to produce more offspring than can survive in their environment due to limited resources and competition. This leads to a struggle for existence, where only the fittest individuals with advantageous traits are able to survive and reproduce.
That idea was popularized by Herbert Spencer, who applied the concept of "survival of the fittest" from Darwin's biological theory of natural selection to society and business. Spencer believed that individuals and businesses that were the strongest, fittest, and most moral would thrive and succeed in society and the marketplace.