1) Who proposed the Documentary Hypothesis?In the mid-1800s, professor Julius Wellhausen (the father of modern Biblical-criticism, 1844-1918) and others, proposed a Documentary Hypothesis concerning the origin of the Hebrew Bible. Wellhausen was a former Divinity student who left the fold, and he decided to form and espouse a secular theory in his field of study. Wellhausen's secular theory was accepted quickly by the academic world, undergoing later change but remaining unchanged in its basic premise.
2) What is the Documentary Hypothesis?Basing itself on linguistics and usage, the Documentary Hypothesis splits the narrative of the Tanakh (Hebrew Bible) and attributes it to various unknown authors (Priest, Deuteronomist, etc. [J,E,P and D]), despite the Torah's explicit statement as to its Divine provenance (Exodus 24:12) and having been written in its entirety by Moses (Deuteronomy 31:24).
See also:
Julius Wellhausen is credited with the four sources Documentary Hypothesis. Almost everything he said had already been proposed by his predecessors, but it was Wellhausen who drew it all together into a coherent hypothesis.
A number of scholars believe that at least some books of the Old Testament have several authors (or sources). One of these sources is called "P." P is an individual or group of individuals who were associated with the priesthood. Thus, the title, "P." The affected biblical books were then supposedly put together by an editor, called a redactor, using the material written by P and other sources. Other scholars dispute the existence of P for at least two reasons: 1) There is no documentary evidence of any writing produced by P. 2) No two scholars seem to agree on exactly what parts of the Old Testament may have been written by P.
Mount Horeb, although there is some variance of opinion as to whether Mount Horeb is entirely synonymous with Mount Sinai or just a lower peak on the way up.In certain biblical passages these events are described as having transpired at Horeb, but though there is a small body of opinion that Sinai and Horeb were different locations,[2]they are generally considered to have been different names for the same place.According to the researchers of the Documentary hypothesis, the name Sinai is only used in the Torah by the Jahwist and Priestly Source, whereas Horeb is only used by the Elohist and Deuteronomist.[11]See link 'Biblical Mount Sinai
There are two biblical creation stories (Genesis 1:1-2:4a and Genesis 2:4b-2:20) that are quite distinct and even contradictory, and each should be read on its own terms, rather than assuming a single creation account. The idea that there is only one biblical creation theory arises because pious readers, believing that the text cannot contain contradictions, ignore the major disjunctions between the two creation stories and tend to treat the second story as the fuller, more detailed account of the creation of man that the first story simply reported.The Priestly source is credited with writing the first biblical creation account, and the Yahwist is credited with writing the second biblical creation account. Thus the Priestly source and the Yahwist were responsible for the biblical concept of creation, although of course each of them was passing on older traditions which they had learnt.Essentially the modern documentary hypothesis is not so much to be compared to the biblical concept of creation, but an explanation for its origin.For more information, please visit:http://christianity.answers.com/theology/the-story-of-creationhttp://christianity.answers.com/bible/the-pentateuch-explained
Creationism is usually associated with a belief that the world was created only a few thousand years ago, much as it is today, and that evolution played no part. This belief is not universally held by all Christians.Many Christians, while believing that God created the universe at some stage in the past, do accept that the world is billions of years old and that evolution resulted in the development of all living things. Even the Catholic Church has moved towards this position:Pope Pius XII stated in his encyclical Humani Generis (1950) that there was no opposition between evolution and the doctrine of the faith and that he considered the doctrine of "evolutionism" a serious hypothesis, worthy of investigation and in-depth study equal to that of the opposing hypothesis;Pope John Paul II, in an address to the Pontifical Academy of Sciences (1996), said that new knowledge has led to the recognition of the theory of evolution as more than a hypothesis;Pope Benedict has refused to endorse "intelligent design" theories, instead backing "theistic evolution" which considers that God created life through evolution with no clash between religion and science.For more information, please visit: http://christianity.answers.com/theology/the-story-of-creation
Julius Wellhausen is credited with the four sources Documentary Hypothesis. Almost everything he said had already been proposed by his predecessors, but it was Wellhausen who drew it all together into a coherent hypothesis.
Opinion: The Documentary Hypothesis, if it was based on fact, might be a way of looking at the Torah. However, it is a theory only, with no physical evidence.The same literary devices which the Torah employs to enrich its text, are pointed at in the JEPD (Documentary) Hypothesis in an attempt to reassign the Torah's authorship.The Jewish sages, based on ancient tradition, identified many of these devices, which include:recapping earlier brief passages to elucidate,employing different names of God to signify His various attributes,using apparent changes or redundancies to allude to additional unstated details,speaking in the vernacular that was current during each era,and many more. While Judaism has always seen the Torah as an intricate tapestry that nonetheless had one Divine source, some modern authors such as Wellhausen (the father of the JEPD hypothesis, 1844-1918) have suggested artificially chopping up the narrative and attributing it to various authors, despite the Torah's explicit statement as to its provenance (Exodus 24:12, Deuteronomy 31:24). This need not concern believers, since his claims have been debunked one by one, as archaeology and other disciplines have demonstrated the integrity of the Torah. No fragments have ever been found that would support the Documentary Hypothesis, which remains nothing more than an arbitrary claim:Debunking the JEPD Documentary HypothesisThe authorship of the Hebrew Bible
The 'J Source' was, of course, anonymous but is called the 'Yahwist' because the source used the name Yahweh (YHWH) for his God. The Documentary hypothesis originated in Germany and for linguistic reasons, Yahweh was translated into German as Jehovah, hence the 'J Source' rather than the 'Y Source'.
Joel S. Baden has written: 'The composition of the Pentateuch' -- subject(s): Redaction Criticism, Criticism, interpretation, Bible, Documentary hypothesis (Pentateuchal criticism)
There are several different types of documentaries. Some of these are, expository documentary, observational documentary, and the observational documentary.
The Jahwist, Elohist, Deuteronomist, and Priestly Writer represents the four authors or groups of authors who wrote the Pentateuch according to the Documentary Hypothesis.
A hypothesis
There is currently no documentary about Usher
a documentary is spelled 'un documentaire' in French.
The Donner Party - documentary - was created in 1992.
Documentary can be an adjective and a noun.
what prefix does hypothesis have? what prefix does hypothesis have?