The passage says that Ham saw his father's nakedness and reported (most likely in derision) to his older brothers. Neither act was honorable; both times Ham had the opportunity to do something right. ( After Ham told his older brother Japeth and Shem, Japeth and Shem went and covered their father's body with a cloth. But when they did it they walked in the tent backwards so that they would not see Noah's nakedness.)
But the whole episode seems rather bizarre and out of proportion to the simple issue of being seen naked. I've looked at most of the commentators and many of them suggest that there is some sort of sexual euphamism in the way it's expressed. http://www.christianmoralquestions.com/ also points out something similar in Habakkuk 2:15: "Woe to him who gives drink to his neighbours, pouring it from the wineskin till they are drunk, so that he can gaze on their naked bodies" and suggests that here too there is some sort of sexual euphamism (after all why would the neighbours want to take their clothes off when they came round for a drink?). The term "being uncovered" usually implied that there was a woman involved (but she wouldn't have been mentioned in that kind of patriarchal narrative).
Of coarse Ham took advantage of his father sexually he was aroused by his father's naked body and his helpless drunken state, and when Noah woke he was aware of what had happened to him, he would have known he had been penetrated.You wouldn't curse your son for seeing you naked that would not make sense at all no matter what he said to his brothers.
The curse placed on Ham's son Canaan by Noah was that he would be a servant of his brothers. This has been interpreted by some as a justification for the enslavement of Canaan's descendants. However, others see it as a historical explanation for the Hebrews' conquest of Canaan.
Genesis 9:22: "And Ham, the father of Canaan, saw the nakedness of his father, and told his two brethren without."
Whenever The Bible talks about a man 'knowing' or 'seeing the nakedness' of another man or woman, it is a euphemism for sex, in this case, the most despised act by Ham of raping his own father and then boasting to his brothers about it. This is confirmed when Noah awoke:
Genesis 9:24:"And Noah awoke from his wine, and knew what his younger son had done unto him. And he said, Cursed be Canaan; a servant of servants shall he be unto his brethren. And he said, Blessed be the LORD God of Shem; and Canaan shall be his servant."
This passage had such obvious political implications that we do not need to believe that it really happened. Noah cursed, not Ham, but Ham's son Canaan, and said that Canaan would forever be the servant to his brethren. When this story was written down, the Canaanites, biblical descendants of the legendary Canaan, were the despised competitors of the Israelites. The curse can be seen as part of a passage that seeks to justify future hatred of the Canaanites.
When Ham saw Noah's nakedness in the Bible, it is interpreted as a disrespectful act towards his father. This incident led to a curse being placed on Ham's son, Canaan, as punishment for his disrespect.
Canaan was cursed in the Bible by his grandfather Noah after he saw Noah naked in his tent. The curse was believed to have been placed on Canaan's descendants, the Canaanites, as a punishment for his father Ham's disrespectful behavior.
In the biblical story, Ham dishonored his father Noah by seeing him naked while he was drunk and then informing his brothers instead of covering him up discreetly. This lack of respect for his father's dignity and privacy led Noah to curse Ham's son Canaan.
The modern descendants of Ham, according to the Bible, are believed to include various African and Middle Eastern peoples. These include nations such as Egypt, Cush (which may refer to Ethiopia or other regions in Africa), and Canaan (which could correspond to parts of the Middle East). However, it's important to note that the identification of specific modern-day descendants of Ham is a topic of debate among scholars and theologians.
In the Bible, after Ham saw his father Noah naked and told his brothers, Noah cursed Canaan instead of Ham. This was likely symbolic of the consequences passing down to future generations, as Canaan was believed to be the ancestor of the Canaanite people who were the enemies of the Israelites. It was a form of punishment that extended beyond just Ham himself.
When Ham saw Noah's nakedness in the Bible, it is interpreted as a disrespectful act towards his father. This incident led to a curse being placed on Ham's son, Canaan, as punishment for his disrespect.
Ham (חם) as a word means "hot" or "father-in-law", but it's not known if the biblical name is related to this word or not.
The Curse of Ham was an interpretation of a biblical story that suggested Ham, one of Noah's sons, was cursed with black skin as punishment. This interpretation was used to justify the enslavement of people of African descent, suggesting they were inherently inferior and destined for servitude. It perpetuated the belief that slavery was morally acceptable for certain races based on religious doctrine.
The reason why ham was cursed was because of the fact that Noah was celebrating the fact that he and his family have been set free from the aspect of what it happened with the flood and with that his son Ham noticed his father being naked and made fun of the issue and was cursed because of that; whereas his two brothers were respectful to their father Noah and they went in with a covering backwards and put the covering over their naked father. Answer 2 Ham was not cursed by anyone. Noah cursed Canaan one of Ham's sons (Genesis 9).
Noahs three sons names are Ham, Shem and Janapeth.
the israelite are the descendant of which one of noahs sons
The curse of Ham is a biblical fallacy perpetrated by people who wanted to justify the enslavement of black people. The premise was that Noah cursed Ham, his black son, and doomed him to a life of servitude to others (slavery). In actuality, there is no curse of Ham, who was Ethiopian, but a curse of Canaan, who was not.
Besides the animals, Noah, his wife, his three sons (Shem, Ham, and Japheth), and their wives were on Noah's Ark.
The names of Noahs three (3) sons were: Shem, Ham, and Japheth. Moses records this fact in the book of Genesis in several places, see chapter 5 verse 32, chapter 6 verse 10, and chapter 7 verse 13.
In Genesis, Noah cursed Canaan only, and did not curse Ham nor any others of Ham's children. The story of Noah and his Ark is now recognised by scholars as unhistorical. Since the Canaanites were the traditional enemy of the Hebrew people, the legend developed around a curse on their putative ancestor.
Canaan was cursed in the Bible by his grandfather Noah after he saw Noah naked in his tent. The curse was believed to have been placed on Canaan's descendants, the Canaanites, as a punishment for his father Ham's disrespectful behavior.
According to Genesis, we know the names of three of Noah's sons: Ham, Shem, and Japeth. Shem is the father of the "Semitic" races (or Shemitic - taking dialects into account). He may have had other sons, but they are not mentioned in the Bible.