Mark's Gospel is a paradox. On the one hand, it is written clumsily and ungrammatically, in an unpolished Greek style. On the other hand, the author displays considerable literary skills, and planned and developed the Gospel with great proficiency.
Some scholars say that Mark's Gospel began as a mimesiscomposition. In ancient Greek times, students of Greek learnt to take one of the great literary works, especially those of Homer, and develop a new and original work, using material from the original. The student's essay need not have been fiction, but the development of the story had to rely on the Homeric epic or other such source. The student had to identify the source that had inspired his writing, but to do so openly was considered boring. The approved method was to place clues, or flags, in the text, so that readers could work out just what part of the great literary works had been used to inspire the new writing.
It appears that the author of Mark's Gospel was skilled at mimesis. Throughout the Gospel can be found words or passages that some scholars say can be interpreted as mimesis flags. Even his use of clumsy and ungrammatical Greek was used to disguise his background and intentions.
The author achieves emphasis by means of two ancient literary techniques, intercalation, and chiastic and parallel structures, which create associations of otherwise unrelated events, in the minds of the reader. The framework parallel structure encompasses the entire gospel, as seen in the following summary:
A . John explains the coming of Jesus (Mark 1:1-8)
B .The baptism of Jesus (1:9)
C . The voice of God from heaven, "Thou art my beloved son" (1:11)
D . The forty days in the wilderness as an allusion to Elijah and Moses (1:13)
E . The people were astonished at what Jesus taught (1:22)
F . Jesus casts out an unclean spirit (1:23-26)
G . Pharisees took counsel with the Herodians how they might destroy Jesus (3:6)
H . Demons, whenever they see Jesus, fall down and say that he is the Son of God.
-- Jesus commands that they tell no one of this (3:11-12)
I .. Jesus calls the 12 disciples (3:13-19)
J .. Jesus rejects his own family: he has a new family, his followers (3:31-35)
K . Jesus rebukes the wind (4:36-41)
L . The demoniac, wearing no clothes (5:15), cries out that Jesus not torment him and Jesus sends out the demons (5:1-20)
M . Jesus comes into his own country (6:1)
-- Where he was brought up
N . The people misunderstand Jesus and he can do no mighty work (6:2-6)
O . Jesus sends out the disciples and curses those who will not receive them (6:7-11)
-- in sending the disciples with authority and expecting all to receive them, Jesus is asserting his own authority
P . Herod thinks that Jesus is John the Baptist risen from the dead (6:14)
Q . Herodias and her daughter conspire to kill John the Baptist (6:16-29)
R . Feeding the thousands, and related miracles and discourses (6:33-8:21)
S . Who do people say that I am (8:27)
T . Peter affirms faith in Jesus as the Christ (8:29)
U . Whosoever shall be ashamed of me: of him also shall the Son of man be ashamed (8:38)
V . The Son of Man must suffer many things and be rejected by the elders, chief priests and scribes (8:31a)
W . Be killed and after three days rise again (8:31b)
X . Prophecy of second coming (9:1)- Jesus tells the disciples that some of them would not taste death until they saw the kingdom of God coming with power.
B' .The Transfiguration of Jesus (9:2-3)
C' .The voice of God from heaven, "This is my beloved son" (9:7)
D' . Jesus talks to Elijah and Moses then to the disciples about Elijah (9:4-13)
E' .A great multitude was amazed at Jesus (9:15)
F' .Jesus cast out a dumb spirit (9:17-27)
G' .They shall kill the Son of man and he shall rise on the third day (9:31)
H' .Jesus clarifies his divine status, saying that he is not God: "Why call me good? There is none good but God" (10:18)
I' . Peter says the disciples have left all and followed Jesus (10:28)
J' . Those who have left their family for Jesus have a new family: all Jesus' followers (10:29-30)
K'. Jesus rebukes the 'sons of thunder', James and John (10:35-45 - cf 3:17)
L' .Blind Bartimaeus cries out for mercy and casts off his clothes, then Jesus heals him (10:46-52)
M' .Jesus comes into Jerusalem (11:1-10)
-- Where he will die
N' .Jesus misunderstands the fig tree that can provide no fruit (11:13-14)
O' .Jesus casts out them that sold and bought in the Temple and curses them for making the Temple a den of thieves (11:15-17)
-- Jesus is asserting his authority
P' .Jesus asks whether the baptism of John is from heaven or of men, and the priests, scribes and elders can not answer (11:30-33)
Q' .Parable of husbandmen who conspire to kill the vineyard owner's son (12:1-9)
X' .Prophecy of second coming (chapter 13)
-- on clouds of glory, within the lifetimes of some of those to whom he was speaking
R' .The Last Supper (14:17-25)
S' .Art thou the Christ, Son of God (14:61)
T' .Peter denies Jesus three times (14:66-72a)
U' .And when he thought thereon, Peter wept (14:72b)
V' .The chief priests, elders and scribes delivered Jesus to Pontius Pilate (15:1)
-- Delivering Jesus is a similar concept to rejecting him.
-- Both parts of the pair involve chief priests, elders and scribes
W' .Jesus dies and on the third day rises again (15:37, 16:6)
A' .The young man explains the departure of Jesus(16:6-8)
Mark's Gospel was the first of a new genre, the narrative gospel.Mark's Gospel is also thought by some to use an ancient Greek literary style known as mimesis. This would arguably place it in a genre of epic adventures.
A: The gospels, including Mark's Gospel, are a specific literary type of their own - they are gospels. Scholars say they differ from biographies because if a biography is found to be substantially untrue, then it is no longer a biography. On the other hand, if a gospel is found to be substantially untrue, then it is still a gospel.
Mark's Gospel can be considered a mixture of literary genres, including biography, drama and martyrology. It was actually both the first of a new genre, the Christian gospel, and the major source of material for the other gospels.
A:The Church Fathers of the second century noticed that, when laid side by side in the Greek language, they could see a great deal of common material in the synoptic gospels (Matthew, Mark and Luke). They was an obvious literary dependency, and they decided that Matthew's Gospel was first and that Mark and Luke were written from it. They might even have attributed this gospel to Matthew, one of the disciples of Jesus, for this very reason. Modern scholars agree that there was a literary dependency but say that Mark's Gospel was actually the first New Testament gospel, written approximately 70 CE. They now realise that Matthewand Luke were copied from Mark.
A:Superficially, Mark's Gospel was written in a rough, ungrammatical style, yet it could be described as a literary work of considerable genius. The entire gospel is developed around a parallel structure, and within this is a very elegant structure for the last twenty four hours to the crucifixion and burial of Jesus. The author also developed an almost unique method of emphasis now known as Markan intercalation. He also used mimesis flags, an ancient Greek device, often used to identify a source. Some have suggested that an author of this considerable ability must have written in the rough, ungrammatical style to hide his real identity (the gospel was anonymous until attributed to Mark in the second century). Footnotes 1A parallel structure is a literary sequence in which an opening set of events is contrasted with another, parallel set of events that mirrors the first. Mark's Gospel as a whole consists of a parallel structure and then contains a smaller chiastic structure around the last day and the crucifixion.
Mark's Gospel was the first of a new genre, the narrative gospel.Mark's Gospel is also thought by some to use an ancient Greek literary style known as mimesis. This would arguably place it in a genre of epic adventures.
A: The gospels, including Mark's Gospel, are a specific literary type of their own - they are gospels. Scholars say they differ from biographies because if a biography is found to be substantially untrue, then it is no longer a biography. On the other hand, if a gospel is found to be substantially untrue, then it is still a gospel.
A:Early Church leaders knew that there was a literary relationship among the Gospels of Matthew, Mark and Luke. They thought that the original of these gospels was Matthew, and that Mark and Luke were derived from it, with Mark's Gospel being a summary. Scholars now realise that Mark was the original New Testament gospel and that Matthew and Luke were derived from it.
Mark's Gospel can be considered a mixture of literary genres, including biography, drama and martyrology. It was actually both the first of a new genre, the Christian gospel, and the major source of material for the other gospels.
Literary style is the style in which the author chooses to write to his or her audience.
A:The Church Fathers of the second century noticed that, when laid side by side in the Greek language, they could see a great deal of common material in the synoptic gospels (Matthew, Mark and Luke). They was an obvious literary dependency, and they decided that Matthew's Gospel was first and that Mark and Luke were written from it. They might even have attributed this gospel to Matthew, one of the disciples of Jesus, for this very reason. Modern scholars agree that there was a literary dependency but say that Mark's Gospel was actually the first New Testament gospel, written approximately 70 CE. They now realise that Matthewand Luke were copied from Mark.
A:The Church Fathers of the second century noticed that, when laid side by side in the Greek language, they could see a great deal of common material in the synoptic gospels (Matthew, Mark and Luke). They was an obvious literary dependency, and they decided that Matthew's Gospel was first and that Mark and Luke were written from it. They might even have attributed this gospel to Matthew, on of the disciples of Jesus, for this very reason. Modern scholars agree that there was a literary dependency but say that Mark's Gospel was actually the first New Testament gospel. They now realise that Matthew and Luke were copied from Mark.
A:Superficially, Mark's Gospel was written in a rough, ungrammatical style, yet it could be described as a literary work of considerable genius. The entire gospel is developed around a parallel structure, and within this is a very elegant structure for the last twenty four hours to the crucifixion and burial of Jesus. The author also developed an almost unique method of emphasis now known as Markan intercalation. He also used mimesis flags, an ancient Greek device, often used to identify a source. Some have suggested that an author of this considerable ability must have written in the rough, ungrammatical style to hide his real identity (the gospel was anonymous until attributed to Mark in the second century). Footnotes 1A parallel structure is a literary sequence in which an opening set of events is contrasted with another, parallel set of events that mirrors the first. Mark's Gospel as a whole consists of a parallel structure and then contains a smaller chiastic structure around the last day and the crucifixion.
Mark Lambert has written: 'Dickens and the suspended quotation' -- subject(s): Direct discourse in literature, English language, Literary style, Style 'Malory' -- subject(s): Arthurian romances, English Romances, English language, History and criticism, Kings and rulers in literature, Knights and knighthood in literature, Literary style, Style
He wrote the second, the Gospel of Mark.
The shortest gospel is the gospel of Mark.
It is generally agreed among modern scholars and liberal theologians that Mark was the earliest gospel written. Evidence of this is that both Matthew and Luke are clearly sourced from Mark. Whenever they agree with Mark, they do so in the same sequence and often in almost the same language in the original Greek. Other evidence, such as Luke's "Missing Block" guarantees a literary connection. The scholars say that a study of the three synoptic gospels shows that Mark's Gospel could not have been sourced from either Matthew's Gospel or Luke's Gospel, and that Matthew and Lukeare too contradictory on non-Markan details for either to be copied from the other, so the only explanation for the literary connection among the synoptic gospels is that Mark was first.