I assume this question means to ask, what is the difference between Augustine's and Luther's theology? The primary difference between the two was their understainding of justification. Augustine did not know Greek, and so read The Bible in Latin. As such, he took justification to mean "to make righteous." Augustine believed that God enacted salvation inside of man. That when a man is converted, their will is changed so that they lvove God and man, and they are only patially righteous. By doing good works in faith the Christian becomes more righteous. Unfortunately this is a very dangerous understanding of justification. Augustine mixed justification and sanctification. This view of justification unfortunately allows room for the Christian to doubt his salvation and undermines the Gospel. Luther believed in forensic justification, that is, that justification takes place outside of man. He understood that the Greek word for "justify" meant "to declare righteous." He believed that immediately upon conversion the Christian was fully righteous in God's sight. He believed that God the Father declares the believer righteous, just, pure, and holy, for the sake of His Son, Jesus Christ. So, for Luther (and according to the Scriptures), the Christian is simultaniously fully sinner, but also fully righteous through faith. Luther did not deny sanctification. He believed sanctification, also called "renewal" occured at the same time as justification. You could not have one without the other. However, he kept them distinguished and emphasized the difference between the two. Justification is the sinner being declared righteous for Christ's sake, and is what saves him alone. Sanctification is the "fruit" of justification and the result of having faith. The Christian does good works because he has faith, but these works do not in any way make the Christian more righteous in God's sight.
One significant difference between the First Crusade and the Second Crusade is the outcomes. The First Crusade resulted in the capture of Jerusalem by the Christian forces, while the Second Crusade did not achieve its primary objective of recapturing Edessa. Additionally, the First Crusade was more successful and united in its goals, while the Second Crusade faced more challenges and internal conflicts among the Christian leaders.
First one is a primary source, because it's from their "Primary View" second one is a secondary source, since they didn't see it in their Primary View, it was told to them. So the answer for apex is (A) primary source; (B) secondary source
In relational databases, tables are linked to each other through relationships defined by keys. A primary key uniquely identifies each record in a table, while a foreign key establishes a link between tables by referencing the primary key of another table. Relationships ensure data integrity and enable the retrieval of related information across multiple tables.
The Israelites would have likely viewed the primary impact of the fall as the introduction of sin and separation from God, leading to suffering, death, and the need for redemption through sacrifice and obedience to God's laws.
Harriet Jacobs primary writing audience for her autobiography "Incidents in the Life of a Slave Girl" was the general public, especially those in the North who were involved in the abolitionist movement. She aimed to educate and raise awareness about the realities of slavery and the struggles faced by enslaved individuals.
what is the difference between primary and seconday vitamin deficiency
difference between primary auxiliary verbs and modal verbs
Identify the difference between primary sector and secondary sector
what are the diffrence between primary reserve and secondary reserve?
The difference between primary data and secondary data is that primary data is the information from the original research.
what is the primary difference between selling points and benefits
spelling
their strategies
their strategies
Primary can't be recharged, secondary can be recharged.
Speed.
Speed