Scholars recognize the unity of the works of Luke and Acts apart from the claims made in the prologues of both to be addressed to the same person as well as to their following each other chronologically in time:
Luke 1:1-4 (King James Version) 1Forasmuch as many have taken in hand to set forth in order a declaration of those things which are most surely believed among us,
2Even as they delivered them unto us, which from the beginning were eyewitnesses, and ministers of the word;
3It seemed good to me also, having had perfect understanding of all things from the very first, to write unto thee in order, most excellent Theophilus,
4That thou mightest know the certainty of those things, wherein thou hast been instructed. Acts 1:1-4 (King James Version) 1The former treatise have I made, O Theophilus, of all that Jesus began both to do and teach,
2Until the day in which he was taken up, after that he through the Holy Ghost had given commandments unto the apostles whom he had chosen:
3To whom also he shewed himself alive after his passion by many infallible proofs, being seen of them forty days, and speaking of the things pertaining to the kingdom of God:
4And, being assembled together with them, commanded them that they should not depart from Jerusalem, but wait for the promise of the Father, which, saith he, ye have heard of me.
Further to this, Acts has a number of 'we' passages which indicate that Luke was a travelling companion of Paul on a number of his missionary journeys. Paul is thought to have been martryed in AD 68 at the latest, or maybe even AD 64 and so, scholars conclude that, since Luke does not mention the death of Paul, he therefore had not yet died when Luke finished Acts. This is further substantiated by the details which Luke does include such as the deaths of both Stephen and James the apostle.
It is thus commonly considered likely that Luke wrote a good portion of Acts in AD 62 when Paul was at Caesarea prior to his being taken to Rome. There was both the time and the opportunity for this to have happened at this time.
The accuracy of Luke as a historian may also relate to his being a contemporary of the events he describes, so he was thus able to write from first-hand experience. Many of the details of Acts which were previously thought to be in error,have been confirmed by archaeological discoveries. This task obviously being made significantly more difficult if Luke were writing at a much later time.
There is no evidence whatsoever that Luke existed at a much later time. The seeming similarities between the writing of Josephus, (who did write towards the end of the first century AD) and Luke can be explained by Josephus either using Luke as a source for his information, or by him having an independent source.
Luke recorded sermons from Apostles Paul, Peter, and James in the Bible.
If you are speaking of Luke who wrote the "Gospel according to Luke" the answer is no. Luke was a physician (Colossians 4:14).
Luke's occupation was that of a doctor. It is written in Colossians 4:14, "Luke, the beloved physician." Colossians was written by Paul.
Luke presented the message of Christ primarily through the sermons of the apostles Peter and Paul. In the book of Acts, Luke documented their teachings and the spread of Christianity following Christ's ascension.
Paul wrote the New Testament letters: Romans Galatians Ephesians 1&2 Corinthians Philippians Colossians 1&2 Thessalonians 1&2 Timothy Titus Philemon
Friends, not quite Girlfriend/Boyfriend, Tear loves him, but not sure about Luke
None.
There is no evidence that Luke ever wrote for Paul.
Well its simple: Anakin is Luke's dad that turns bad just before Luke is born
Paul's mother's love had "turned to dust."
Luke traveled to rome so he would see the over side of the worldi believe he was with Paul... Apparently they were good friends and Luke wrote his Gospel while Paul was imprisoned in Rome around 61AD...
i dont know. i was wondering so myself
Luke was a companion of Paul, and not a apostle.
Luke and Mary were not related.
There is speculation that Luke was a gentile and not a Jew. The quote in the Letter of Paul to the Colossians differentiating between Luke and other colleagues "of the circumcision" seems to indicate he was not a Jew or, if he was, he did not strictly adhere to Jewish practices.
The text are indicated in the order of Matthew, Mark, Luke and John. The initial 12 did not include Mark nor Luke. (See Acts 1). One finds Mark and Luke as those serving with the Apostle Paul
Luke was a missionary companion of Paul, for one thing.