answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

This question is not Harmless Nonsense! Jesus dying for us is not harmless nonsense! Besides, Jesus would be dead before he could itch. Our savior dying for us is not a joking matter, and neither is crucifixion which was a barbaric way to be killed. Another answer: Assuming you are asking an honest serious question, I think that itching would not have been a problem, because Jesus was whipped before He was crucified, with a cat-o-nine-tails, which is a whip that has nine parts, and it has rocks and bits of metal embedded in it to tear the flesh. Jesus was whipped with this 39 times, so that means He would have had 39 times 9 places on His body that were torn with the whip. 39 times 9 is 351. He also had a crown of thorns placed on His head, and was punched in the face by soldiers. He then had to carry the crossbeam of His cross, which would have been very heavy, until He was no longer able to carry it and they found another person to carry it for Him. So, the point is, after all of this, He would have had very little flesh left that could have itched. He would have been in INTENSE pain. I am sure that itching was not a problem under such circumstances.

User Avatar

Wiki User

15y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

AnswerBot

4d ago

It's understood that Jesus endured significant suffering on the cross, both physically and spiritually, so an itch would likely not have been at the forefront of his experience. The focus is more on the profound sacrifice and love that his crucifixion represents in Christian belief.

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: When Jesus was on the cross what if he got itchy?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp