answersLogoWhite

0

A:

Some scholars have pointed out that the teachings of Jesus, as described in the New Testament gospels, were not very different from those of the Jewish religious leaders. He was also careful not to appear to oppose Roman rule in Palestine (See Mark 12:17: "Render unto Caesar..."). They say there is nothing here that would cause such great offence as to demand his crucifixion.

In the synoptic gospels (Matthew, Mark and Luke) the trigger for Jesus' arrest was the turmoil he caused when he overturned the tables of the moneychangers, and the seats of those who sold doves in the Temple. They were going about their lawful business, sanctioned by the priests, of providing an important service to allow sacrifices to be made in the Temple. Arguably, this would have justified crucifixion, by the harsh standards of the day.

In John's Gospel, the 'Cleansing of the Temple' is downgraded and moved to the beginning of Jesus' mission, so that it could not have been the reason for Jesus's arrest (John 2:14-16). Instead, the priests conspired to arrest Jesus because he had raised Lazarus from the dead and all the people were following him Jesus (See John 11:47-48: "Then gathered the chief priests and Pharisees a council, and said, What do we? for this man doeth many miracles. If we leave him thus alone, all men will believe on him: and the Romans will come and take away both our place and our nation."). In this account, Jesus was arrested and crucified because his mission was undermining the power of the priests and Pharisees. In John's Gospel, there is no case made for the crucifixion of Jesus.

User Avatar

Wiki User

11y ago

What else can I help you with?