answersLogoWhite

0

A:

The author of 2 Peter goes out of his way to insist that he is Peter, as he not only names himself Simeon Peter (2 Peter 1:1), but stresses that he was personally present with Jesus on the mount at the transfiguration (2:16-19). The use of the Hebrew 'Simeon' is one of several giveaways that this epistle was not really written by the Apostle Peter, who would always have used the Aramaic form, from his native language - Simon Peter. The Greek-speaking author of 2 Peter was trying too hard to sound like the apostle Peter. (The KJV corrects this error, translating Simeon into English as Simon, but other Bibles keep the original). The author knew about 'all' Paul's epistles (2 Peter 3:15-16) and thought Paul's epistles were already scripture ('other scriptures' - 2 Peter 3:16), neither of which could have been during Paul's lifetime.

The author uses this epistle and Paul's name to attack his own opponents, the 'false prophets', with numerous verbal similarities to what can be found in the New Testament book of Jude. The parallels are so numerous that scholars are virtually unified in thinking that the author has taken Jude's message and simply edited it a bit to incorporate it into his book.

When Peter was actually still alive, there was still eager expectation that Jesus would return soon. With the passing of time that the Christian claim that all would take place "within this generation" (Mark 13:30) and before the disciples had "tasted death" (9:1) started to ring hollow. By the time 2 Peter was written, Christians were having to defend themselves in the face of opponents who mocked their view that the end was supposed to be imminent. So 'Peter' has to explain that even if the end is thousands of years off, it is still right around the corner by God's calendar.
A:

There are two letters attributed to Peter, but New Testament scholars say that neither of them was written by Peter.

First Peter was written from Rome and euphemistically refers to Rome as Babylon (1 Peter 5:13), a clue that allows us to date this epistle to the 80s or 90s of the first century. The Christian and Jewish communities began to refer to Rome as 'Babylon' after Rome destroyed the Jerusalem Temple in 70 CE, just as Babylon had done centuies earlier.

2 Peter was clearly written towards the middle of the second century, although the author goes out of his way to insist that he is Peter, as he not only names himself Simeon Peter (1:1), but stresses that he was personally present with Jesus on the mount at the transfiguration (2:16-19). This epistle was written to oppose Christians of a gnostic persuasion who, from the author's point of view, threatened several ideas the author found central to Christian faith: the prophetic interpretation of the Jewish scriptures, the gospel story of a real Jesus who was also the son of God, the Christian ethic of sexual continence and clean living (holiness), and the apocalyptic view of history.

User Avatar

Wiki User

11y ago

What else can I help you with?

Continue Learning about Religious Studies

When were 1 Peter and 2 Peter written?

It is clear from the context of the material that both 1 Peter and 2 Peter were written during the second century. Further evidence of the late date of 2 Peter is that it incorporates, as a block, almost all of the Epistle of Jude, clearly a second century composition.


Where is the last mention of Peter in the New Testament?

The last mention of Peter in the New Testament is in 2 Peter, which is believed to be written by Peter himself, where he encourages believers to grow in their faith and warns against false teachings.


In what two passages do New Testament books call other New Testament books Scripture?

One passage that clearly does so: In 2 Peter 3:15 and 16, Peter refers to Paul's epistles in league with "the rest of the Scriptures." (KJV - "the other scriptures.")


Where did peter preach his first sermon?

Peter preached his first sermon in Jerusalem on the day of Pentecost, following the arrival of the Holy Spirit. This sermon is recorded in the New Testament in the book of Acts, chapter 2.


Why was Apostle Mark's mentor Peter?

The Church Fathers noticed that 2 Peter 5:13 has Peter refer to Mark as "my son." Unaware that Second Peter is a pseudepigraphical epistle, they assumed this either meant that Mark was indeed the son of Peter or at least that Peter held Mark in high esteem. A tradition subsequently arose that Mark wrote the second gospel based on the memoirs of Peter, although another early tradition was that Mark's Gospel was written as a summary of Matthew's Gospel (the evidence is that Mark's Gospel was actually written before Matthew).Because we now know that 2 Peter was written long after the death of Peter, it can no longer be considered as evidence that Mark even knew Peter. Mark's Gospel was written before Matthew).

Related Questions

Which book did Paul not write?

St Paul for sure did not write the books of Matthew, Mark, Luke, John, Acts of the Apostles, James, Peter 1, Peter 2, Revelation, and others.


When did St Peter write his letters to the Jews?

A:There are two letters attributed to Saint Peter (1 Peter and 2 Peter), but these were written to Christians, not to Jews. Both were written during the first half of the second century, with 2 Peter probably no earlier than 124 CE.


Did Simon Peter write 2 books in the Bible if so what are they?

The two books known as The First Epistle of Peter (1 Peter) and The Second Epistle of Peter (2 Peter) are traditionally attributed to Simon Peter. However, biblical scholars say that both books were actually written in the second century, by two different anonymous authors.


How do you write peter in Hindi?

'Peter' would be written in Hindi as पीटर.


How many Gospels did Peter write?

According to Acts 4:13, both Peter and his companion John were agrammatoi, a Greek word that literally means ‘unlettered’ or illiterate, meaning Peter could not have written any gospels or epistles. One of the reasons once put forward for Mark as the author of the gospel that now bears his name, was that Peter needed him to write down is recollections about Jesus. However, Bart D. Ehrman (Forged) says producing books in the name of Peter was a virtual cottage industry in the early church. Thus we have (among others) the non-canonical Gospel of Peter and the two canonical epistles attributed to him.


What instruments did Peter Tchaikovsky write for?

violin


How do you write Peter in Irish writing?

Peadar


Where do you write to peter MacNicolthe actor?

Entertainment


Who did saint peter write a letter to?

Peter wrote his letters mainly to the Jewish people.


How many of Peter's letters are attributed to John?

-----------------------As far as we know, the apostle Peter did not write any letters (1 Peter and 2 Peter are believed to have been written in the second century, using Peter's name). While those attributed to John are unlikely to have really been written by the disciple of that name, there is no good reason to believe that they were written by Peter.


Did Peter only write two books in the Bible?

A:The two books known as The First Epistle of Peter (1 Peter) and The Second Epistle of Peter (2 Peter) are traditionally attributed to Simon Peter. However, New Testament scholars say that both books were actually written in the second century, by two different but anonymous authors. Peter wrote neither of these.


Did Disney write Peter Pan?

The original story of Peter Pan was written by J.M. Barrie. The writers at Disney did write the script for the 1953 film, though.