answersLogoWhite

0

Studying historical figures allows us to understand the complexities of human behavior, motivations, and the impact of their actions on society. By examining their lives and contributions, we can gain insights into the shaping of cultures, beliefs, and events that have shaped the world we live in today.

User Avatar

AnswerBot

1y ago

What else can I help you with?

Continue Learning about Religious Studies

Is Lucius Heinous VII a demon?

In the unaired pilot of Jimmy Two-Shoes, Lucius was intended to be Lucifer, Ruler of Hell but seeing as the creators wanted to make the show more age appropriate for the children they changed Lucifer's name to Lucius and changed Hell into Miseryville.


Is nature fighting back?

yes it is but well i will try my best to expaine nature is frighting back but this is life we try our best to sevive some die early and some die to the end. Nature is fighting back because she has to rid herself of all these human bacteria and parasites who plunder and destroy simply to fuel their selfishness and greed. These filthy creatures are the creators of garbage, disease and pollution. They constantly upsets the balance of nature and they add no essential value to the welfare of the earth.


What is God and its culture?

God is recognized a measurable aspect of divinity. This particular aspect of divinity called God has shape and form as a result of which it is measurable. This divinity called God is limited by the imagination of its creators. The culture of this fictional (Santa-Claus) character is determined by the traditions of the particular religious sect. He is assigned as the absolute unquestionable authority governing the manmade cultures, rituals and rules of the religion.


Does God have feet?

God is a Spirit and so has no literal body parts. However the Bible contains many phrases known as anthrpomorphisms such as 'the arm of the Lord' which ascribe body parts to Him. These are only for the instruction of mortals so we can gain an understanding of God acting in history and that make a particular point in context regarding God's work or His character.So, in a short answer, He has no feet.Perhaps this is the origin of the saying 'He has no feet but our feet...etc' - implying that God uses people, as indeed He does, to achieve His purposes.According to the Bible, YesDeuteronomy 23:13, And thou shalt have a paddle upon thy weapon; and it shall be, when thou wilt ease thyself abroad, thou shalt dig therewith, and shalt turn back and cover that which cometh from thee:23:14 For the LORD thy God WALKETH in the midst of thy camp, to deliver thee, and to give up thine enemies before thee; therefore shall thy camp be holy: that he see no unclean thing in thee, and turn away from thee.Genesis 3:8 And they heard the voice of the LORD God WALKING in the garden in the cool of the day.AnswerThose Gods which were created by men at the beginning of civilization, to be in their own image and likeness, were designed with all the physical/emotional features and characteristics of their human creators. It is clearly obvious to the rational mind that there are some modern theological depictions which have been conveniently altered to mesmerize the intelligence of the susceptible mind.


Why is it called Deuteronomic history?

Another answer from our community:The Deuteronomic History is named by the developers of the documentary hypothesis in the 19th century to refer to the history also written by the author of Deuteronomy. They gave this history a separate name because they believed it represented a different perspective of a different author who wrote much later than the time of Moses.This is connected with their second major presupposition, that of an evolutionary development of the religion of Israel from primitive polytheism (many gods) to Henotheism (many gods, with one chief god) to Monotheism (one God). Josiah's reform was intended to bring the 'triumph of Monotheism' by attributing its authority to antiquity, whereas it was the invention of a much alter age.Thus although the theory is elaborate it has no supporting evidence except its own internal circular reasoning. There never was any evidence of any kind for the theory as postulated, except in the minds of its creators and proponents. No documents of any kind exist which support the proposed deuteronomic history or the existence of the alleged author. No corroborating historical detail external to the Bible itself, supports it. The internal witness of the Bible itself, also thoroughly refutes this history.Thus there never was such a thing as the Deuteronomic History as postulated by the documentary theorists. Nor was there a necessity to create such a history. I believe the evidence points toward a single author in the time-frame suggested by the text itself, around 1400 BC, that person being Moses.