probably not, the snake would find it hard to adapt into the environment because it was raised by a human and not by its mother.
Animals can survive in the wild if they are raised in captivity, but mot are killed because they are unprepared for wild living conditions.
The python from the first Harry Potter book is from Brazil.
Technically the forest like wolves, but dogs have been so domesticated that a pup raised in captivity wouldn't be able to survive.
Human intervention saved this species. Many were raised in captivity, and now around 400 are back in their former haunts.
yes
Kangaroos actually adapt quite easily to a life in captivity if they have been raised as household pets. They cannot adapt if they have been taken from the wild. When injured wild kangaroos are nursed back to health, they must be released into the wild or, if unlikely to survive due to the nature of their injuries, they must be accommodated by an animal sanctuary that has wide, open spaces for these animals.
it depends where it was raised. captivity NO. wild YES
grizzly bears usually live for about 40 years in captivity
During the 1860s, the United States developed techniques for raising salmon and trout in captivity.
I'm guessing it's a tiger that was born and raised in captivity.
No. The colour of an elephants eyes is entirely dependant upon its DNA and genes and has nothing to do with its captivity or freedom.
Tiger cubs normally live without their fathers, but in the wild they wouldn't survive for very long without their mothers. They could live without their mothers if they're raised in captivity though.