Rattlesnake venom is not poisonous so would be safe to consume as long as you have no open sores or cuts in your mouth, throat or stomach. It would be digested just as food is.
Yes, it would be safe to consume because the venom of a rattlesnake is not a poison. The venom would be deactivated by the cooking process, also.
Yes, it would, but the rattlesnake has poison.
Coyote told rattlesnake that he would know who was telling the truth if rattlesnake would get under the giant stone again but he left rattlesnake under the stone.
In a fight between a bull snake and a rattlesnake, the rattlesnake would likely win due to its venomous bite.
i would say the tiger, because it could jus like step on the rattlesnake nd then the rattlesnake would be dead, but then again, the rattlesnake could like bite the tiger nd inject venom, nd then the tiger is doomed.
No, desert tortoises are not on a rattlesnake's menu.
It would produce a rarely seen variety called a timberback.
Flora are plants and Fauna are animals so a sidewinder rattlesnake would be a Fauna.
intact is a dumb word
I would be careful with a Mojave rattlesnake there the most venomous rattlesnake but they can be worth a lot of money i would say any where from 100$ to 500$ getting a rattlesnake of any kind its a lot of money.
The eastern diamondback is larger than the timber rattlesnake, and they would probably ignore each other in the wild.
Well it depends on how you look at it, a bite from a rattlesnake would obviously be alot more serious than that of a kingsnake bite, but if it were like a fight with the two whichever one is bigger would most likely be the one to win, the KINGsnake gets it name from being impervious to venom, therefore the kingsnake could consume the rattlesnake without harm.