Either the property of a person/business, etc - or - general ideas/theroies regarding a certain argument.
all the assumption of planning is premises...
on the premises
It does not match your Premises. That is how we can use Premises.
A deductively valid argument is if the premises are true then the conclusion is certainly true, not possibly true. The definition does not say that the conclusion is true.
He did not say it. It is misattributed to him, like the "definition of insanity" quote is misattributed to Einstein.
Premises has two definitions:Premises can refer to a house or building, along with its land and outbuildings, usually occupied by a business or being used for a formal or official purpose.'Alcohol was not to be served on the premises during the party.'A premise refers to a statement or proposition which is followed by a form of conclusion.'The premise was followed by an affirmative conclusion.'
A deductively valid argument is if the premises are true then the conclusion is certainly true, not possibly true. The definition does not say that the conclusion is true.
Business premises is correct, just as you have it.
on
An argument that is invalid is one where the conclusion does not logically follow from the premises. A sound argument is one that is valid and has true premises. So, by definition, an argument cannot be both invalid and sound at the same time because for an argument to be sound it must be valid.
Freehold premises are classified as non-current assets. This is because they represent long-term investments in property that a company owns, which are not expected to be converted into cash or consumed within the next year. Non-current assets typically include items that will provide economic benefits over an extended period, and freehold premises fit this definition.
premises is an asset