No, now stop being a fool!
no.
To determine which formula is likely to be incorrect, one would need to evaluate each formula based on its context and application. Common sources of error include incorrect variable relationships, inappropriate units, or misapplication of mathematical principles. Without specific formulas presented, I cannot identify which one may be incorrect. Please provide the formulas in question for a more accurate assessment.
The spelling mesher would be someone that meshed.The likely word sought is measure (to determine size or quantity).
because it wouldn't be called the "secret" formula if they told you what it was! and if it was revealed, someone would be likely to "try" to make it, but it would end up in an epic fail.
This is likely the word "functions" (uses, or mathematical equations).
To find the empirical formula, we need to determine the ratio of atoms present in the compound. First, convert the masses of chromium and oxygen to moles. The mole ratio will be approximately 2:3, indicating the compound is most likely chromium(III) oxide with the empirical formula Cr2O3.
To determine the difference between an ionic and a covalent compound from its chemical formula, you can look at the elements involved. Ionic compounds typically involve a metal and a nonmetal, while covalent compounds involve nonmetals only. Additionally, if the compound contains a metal combined with a polyatomic ion, it is likely ionic.
Your question does not have enough information to answer.You cannot get an answer with a mathematical formula because you haven't added nearly enough information. Perhaps you could write a legal brief using an imaginary case and then the contributing lawyers could read it and see if any statistics would fit in anywhere, if they have the time. All you can get is a general answer that statistics often are used in litigation but they need to fit the facts of the case and be helpful to the plaintiff's or defendant's arguments. The attorney would more likely use a well authored statistic rather than create a mathematical formula.Your question does not have enough information to answer.You cannot get an answer with a mathematical formula because you haven't added nearly enough information. Perhaps you could write a legal brief using an imaginary case and then the contributing lawyers could read it and see if any statistics would fit in anywhere, if they have the time. All you can get is a general answer that statistics often are used in litigation but they need to fit the facts of the case and be helpful to the plaintiff's or defendant's arguments. The attorney would more likely use a well authored statistic rather than create a mathematical formula.Your question does not have enough information to answer.You cannot get an answer with a mathematical formula because you haven't added nearly enough information. Perhaps you could write a legal brief using an imaginary case and then the contributing lawyers could read it and see if any statistics would fit in anywhere, if they have the time. All you can get is a general answer that statistics often are used in litigation but they need to fit the facts of the case and be helpful to the plaintiff's or defendant's arguments. The attorney would more likely use a well authored statistic rather than create a mathematical formula.Your question does not have enough information to answer.You cannot get an answer with a mathematical formula because you haven't added nearly enough information. Perhaps you could write a legal brief using an imaginary case and then the contributing lawyers could read it and see if any statistics would fit in anywhere, if they have the time. All you can get is a general answer that statistics often are used in litigation but they need to fit the facts of the case and be helpful to the plaintiff's or defendant's arguments. The attorney would more likely use a well authored statistic rather than create a mathematical formula.
To determine if Timothy is circumcised, one would need to visually inspect the penis. If the foreskin is absent and the head of the penis is exposed, Timothy is likely circumcised. If the foreskin covers the head of the penis, Timothy is likely uncircumcised. It is important to note that only a medical professional should perform this examination.
A tiger shark is the most likely to kill someone.
Most honest lawyers are ones who are not scared of telling you the hard truth. If someone just tells you everything is going to be OK, and they don't need to do a thing, the likely thing is that they are not being honest.
The molar mass of iron is 55.85 g/mol and that of chlorine is 35.45 g/mol. To find the empirical formula, we need to determine the ratio of the elements in the compound. The ratio of iron to chlorine in this case is approximately 1:3, so the most likely empirical formula for this compound is FeCl3 (iron(III) chloride).