0
They just don't want to keep carrying the high quality clothing. They don't even carry the George brand pants any more. Sam's Club is even worse.
Presuming the statement to be correct (i.e., that the quality IS in fact getting objectively poorer, which may or may not be true), it's probably NOT that Wal-Mart "doesn't want" high quality clothing, but that they are much more interested in low prices.
It is reasonably well known that Wal-Mart uses its huge purchasing power to pressure its suppliers to provide existing products at lower cost (so that Wal-Mart can then pass a portion of the savings to the customer, allowing them to truthfully claim to be "lowering prices" without actually cutting into their own profit margins). In order to do this, the manufacturers may have to cut corners.
It is true. You can take a look for your self. What you could buy before you can't buy now. As for the reason, well we know Wal-Mart wants to make money. That is nothing new. I would assume they wanted to make money when the quality was better also. One more thing. I was not the one that brought up the fact that the quality was getting poorer. Who ever wrote the question brought that up.
What else can I help you with?
Is England getting poorer or richer?
poorer The rich are getting richer and the poor poorer.
What was generally true about segregated facililties?
Facilities for African Americans were of poorer quality.
Is it a problem if the rich are getting richer and the poor are getting poorer?
no
What was Uneven Prosperity?
When the rich were getting richer and the poor were getting poorer.
What did wealthy PEOPLE wear in Ancient Rome?
There was actually no difference in the clothing of the rich and poor. The Romans wore the tunic and toga or cloak, the palla and stola. The styles were just about the same. The difference was in the quality of the fabrics of the clothing. The wealthy would wear the lighter weight wools or even cotton and linen, while the poorer people would have clothes made of coarser materials and not dyed as colorfully as the wealthy.There was actually no difference in the clothing of the rich and poor. The Romans wore the tunic and toga or cloak, the palla and stola. The styles were just about the same. The difference was in the quality of the fabrics of the clothing. The wealthy would wear the lighter weight wools or even cotton and linen, while the poorer people would have clothes made of coarser materials and not dyed as colorfully as the wealthy.There was actually no difference in the clothing of the rich and poor. The Romans wore the tunic and toga or cloak, the palla and stola. The styles were just about the same. The difference was in the quality of the fabrics of the clothing. The wealthy would wear the lighter weight wools or even cotton and linen, while the poorer people would have clothes made of coarser materials and not dyed as colorfully as the wealthy.There was actually no difference in the clothing of the rich and poor. The Romans wore the tunic and toga or cloak, the palla and stola. The styles were just about the same. The difference was in the quality of the fabrics of the clothing. The wealthy would wear the lighter weight wools or even cotton and linen, while the poorer people would have clothes made of coarser materials and not dyed as colorfully as the wealthy.There was actually no difference in the clothing of the rich and poor. The Romans wore the tunic and toga or cloak, the palla and stola. The styles were just about the same. The difference was in the quality of the fabrics of the clothing. The wealthy would wear the lighter weight wools or even cotton and linen, while the poorer people would have clothes made of coarser materials and not dyed as colorfully as the wealthy.There was actually no difference in the clothing of the rich and poor. The Romans wore the tunic and toga or cloak, the palla and stola. The styles were just about the same. The difference was in the quality of the fabrics of the clothing. The wealthy would wear the lighter weight wools or even cotton and linen, while the poorer people would have clothes made of coarser materials and not dyed as colorfully as the wealthy.There was actually no difference in the clothing of the rich and poor. The Romans wore the tunic and toga or cloak, the palla and stola. The styles were just about the same. The difference was in the quality of the fabrics of the clothing. The wealthy would wear the lighter weight wools or even cotton and linen, while the poorer people would have clothes made of coarser materials and not dyed as colorfully as the wealthy.There was actually no difference in the clothing of the rich and poor. The Romans wore the tunic and toga or cloak, the palla and stola. The styles were just about the same. The difference was in the quality of the fabrics of the clothing. The wealthy would wear the lighter weight wools or even cotton and linen, while the poorer people would have clothes made of coarser materials and not dyed as colorfully as the wealthy.There was actually no difference in the clothing of the rich and poor. The Romans wore the tunic and toga or cloak, the palla and stola. The styles were just about the same. The difference was in the quality of the fabrics of the clothing. The wealthy would wear the lighter weight wools or even cotton and linen, while the poorer people would have clothes made of coarser materials and not dyed as colorfully as the wealthy.
What clothes did wealthy people in rome wear?
There was actually no difference in the clothing of the rich and poor. The Romans wore the tunic and toga or cloak, the palla and stola. The styles were just about the same. The difference was in the quality of the fabrics of the clothing. The wealthy would wear the lighter weight wools or even cotton and linen, while the poorer people would have clothes made of coarser materials and not dyed as colorfully as the wealthy.There was actually no difference in the clothing of the rich and poor. The Romans wore the tunic and toga or cloak, the palla and stola. The styles were just about the same. The difference was in the quality of the fabrics of the clothing. The wealthy would wear the lighter weight wools or even cotton and linen, while the poorer people would have clothes made of coarser materials and not dyed as colorfully as the wealthy.There was actually no difference in the clothing of the rich and poor. The Romans wore the tunic and toga or cloak, the palla and stola. The styles were just about the same. The difference was in the quality of the fabrics of the clothing. The wealthy would wear the lighter weight wools or even cotton and linen, while the poorer people would have clothes made of coarser materials and not dyed as colorfully as the wealthy.There was actually no difference in the clothing of the rich and poor. The Romans wore the tunic and toga or cloak, the palla and stola. The styles were just about the same. The difference was in the quality of the fabrics of the clothing. The wealthy would wear the lighter weight wools or even cotton and linen, while the poorer people would have clothes made of coarser materials and not dyed as colorfully as the wealthy.There was actually no difference in the clothing of the rich and poor. The Romans wore the tunic and toga or cloak, the palla and stola. The styles were just about the same. The difference was in the quality of the fabrics of the clothing. The wealthy would wear the lighter weight wools or even cotton and linen, while the poorer people would have clothes made of coarser materials and not dyed as colorfully as the wealthy.There was actually no difference in the clothing of the rich and poor. The Romans wore the tunic and toga or cloak, the palla and stola. The styles were just about the same. The difference was in the quality of the fabrics of the clothing. The wealthy would wear the lighter weight wools or even cotton and linen, while the poorer people would have clothes made of coarser materials and not dyed as colorfully as the wealthy.There was actually no difference in the clothing of the rich and poor. The Romans wore the tunic and toga or cloak, the palla and stola. The styles were just about the same. The difference was in the quality of the fabrics of the clothing. The wealthy would wear the lighter weight wools or even cotton and linen, while the poorer people would have clothes made of coarser materials and not dyed as colorfully as the wealthy.There was actually no difference in the clothing of the rich and poor. The Romans wore the tunic and toga or cloak, the palla and stola. The styles were just about the same. The difference was in the quality of the fabrics of the clothing. The wealthy would wear the lighter weight wools or even cotton and linen, while the poorer people would have clothes made of coarser materials and not dyed as colorfully as the wealthy.There was actually no difference in the clothing of the rich and poor. The Romans wore the tunic and toga or cloak, the palla and stola. The styles were just about the same. The difference was in the quality of the fabrics of the clothing. The wealthy would wear the lighter weight wools or even cotton and linen, while the poorer people would have clothes made of coarser materials and not dyed as colorfully as the wealthy.
What kind of clothing do people wear in Botswana?
saris for poorer people and western clothes for the wealthy
What was generally true about segregated facilities?
Facilities for African Americans were of poorer quality.
Who makes Schlotzsky's deli-chips?
if it's Lays, it is not as good a quality as a regular bag of Lays chips. Chip quality at Schlotsky's is a poorer quality.
How a benchmarking might contribute to improve quality?
A benchmark is the minimum level of quality a product must reach. Any product falling below the benchmark is considered to be of poorer quality.
Is Brazil getting poorer or richer?
The rich are getting richer and the poor are getting poorer, while the middle class is staying the same, but internationally, Brazil is the 7th most economical powerful country in the world, but it will be fourth in a couple of years, so I guess you could say Brazil is getting richer everyday.
What did Karl Marx call people getting richer and richer?
Easy = The rich get richer and the poor get poorer
