what is the difference beetween social work and community development
Contrasting studies
Ross J. Gittell has written: 'Renewing cities' -- subject(s): Case studies, Community development, Urban, Economic aspects, Economic aspects of Urban renewal, Urban Community development, Urban renewal 'Community organizing' -- subject(s): Case studies, Community development, Social capital (Sociology), Community development corporations, Community organization
Community organizing can be categorized into several types, including grassroots organizing, which mobilizes local residents around shared issues; issue-based organizing, focused on specific concerns like housing or education; and electoral organizing, which aims to influence political processes and voter engagement. Additionally, there is community development organizing, which emphasizes building local capacity and resources. Each type employs strategies to empower participants and foster collective action for social change.
a population is a count of one species & a community counts as many species all at same time.
There are several characteristics of community organizing. These include the influence of government, the fostering of social reform, and the seeking of direct representation.
Bullhorn or public television.
For more details about COPAR, Please visit: http://nursester.blogspot.com/2009/02/community-organizing-participatory.html COPAR (Community Organizing Participatory Action Research) is a social development approach that aims to transform the apathetic, individualistic and voiceless poor into dynamic, participatory and politically responsive community. IMPORTANCE OF COPAR COPAR is an important tool for community development and people empowerment as this helps the community workers to generate community participation in development activites. COPAR prepares people to eventually take over the management of a development program in the future. COPAR maximizes community participation and involvement: community resources are mobilized for health development services. PRINCIPLES: 1. People especially the most oppressed, exploited and deprived sectors are open to change, have the capacity to change and are able to bring about change. 2. COPAR should be based on the interest of the poorest sector of the community. 3. COPAR should lead to a self-reliant community and society. CRITICAL STEPS (ACTIVITIES): 1. Integration 2. Social Investigation 3. Tentative program planning 4.Groundwork 5. The meeting 6. Role Play 7. Mobilization or action 8. Evaluation 9. Reflection 10. Organization Community Organizing Participatory Action Research (HRDP III-COPAR) is developed to make healt services accesible and available for depressed and underserved communities in the Philippines.
Similarities among Native American social structures included community-based governance, emphasis on kinship ties, and respect for nature. Differences could be seen in societal organization (e.g. matrilineal vs. patrilineal), economic systems, and social roles based on region or culture.
what are the classificationss of community
A disadvantage of community development is that there will be more traffic. Another disadvantage of community development is noise, more people, and more crime.
community development planning is more like community planning for its development. This is like strategy taken in order to develop a community