Pollution emissions can be measured by mass of pollution for the source or the per capital pollution foe each person using it.The average bus probably does pollute more than the average car or van, but it is more efficient in that the one bus will serve many more people. On aper passenger basis a car with One passenger can be 10 times more "dirtier" than a full bus. (See Link)
they give off 100,000,000,000,000 joules a month
Yes. Although there are quite a lot of buses
false buses are better because they can carry more people.
they don't pollute the air
In all probability there would be more car accidents than buses because the cars out number them
NO.
Passenger trains had sleeping compartments and some had dining cars, which buses do not have. Overall, though, buses are more comfortable as far as the comfort of the ride goes.
buses
Buses are much different vehicles. Different powertrains, different suspension systems, and, depending on what type of bus you refer to, RR platforms (rear engine, real wheel drive) can be quite common, whereas they're quite rare on cars.
Not much since other mp3s beside Apple iPods hold about 25% of the mp3 market share. And also cars pollute way more than mp3 companies.
Buses stop at railroad tracks to ensure that trains are not close by. Buses are longer than cars and therefore need more time to get across the tracks.
no.it would not but it would be better if you used cars that didn't pollute so much
If more of us use buses, yes it can help. Buses usually produce much less carbon dioxide per passenger-mile than do private cars.