100%of them have access to clean water as they are a first world country as well as being part of the G8 countries
Approximately 99.95% of people in London have access to clean drinking water which meets the national standards for quality. This high amount of coverage ensures that the vast majority of residents in London have safe and healthy water for drinking and other daily needs.
According to the World Health Organisation in 2006 13% of the world's population still did not have access to safe drinking water or 887,000,000 people. This is an improvement since 1990 when 1,600,000,000 did not have access to safe water. Only about half the world's population can turn on a tap in their homes. Answer2: In the last five years,, some 20 million children have died of preventable waterborne diseases, and hundreds of millions of people continue to live with the daily misery of squalor associated with lack of clean drinking water and adequate sanitation. (from 1/2006 Awake magazine on Jehovah's Witnesses official website)
Millions of people in Africa die each year due to lack of access to clean water, which leads to waterborne diseases and malnutrition. The exact number fluctuates yearly due to various factors such as droughts and humanitarian aid efforts. Addressing the water crisis in Africa remains a critical global challenge.
About 2.2 billion people globally do not have access to safely managed drinking water in their homes, meaning they may lack running water. This issue disproportionately affects people in developing countries and rural areas. Efforts to improve access to clean water and sanitation are essential for addressing this problem.
Nuclear energy is not considered completely clean because of the risks associated with nuclear accidents, such as Chernobyl and Fukushima. Additionally, the mining and refining of uranium to fuel nuclear reactors can have environmental impacts, and the management of radioactive waste is a long-term challenge.
yes if we build a dome around the nuclear reactor we may be able to contain the radiation but we will not be able to clean up the radiation left over already.
The Soviet government funded most of the clean-up efforts in Chernobyl after the nuclear disaster in 1986. Other countries and organizations also provided financial assistance and resources to help with the cleanup and containment of the radioactive contamination.
If you mean nuclear power then:It is helpful because it has an almost infinite supply of fuel and is fairly clean energy, but if the protection from the radiation is defective it can spread harmful radiation all around the area, like in Chernobyl and Japan, although the former is a very extreme example.
Opinions on nuclear power vary. Some believe it is a clean and efficient energy source that can help reduce greenhouse gas emissions, while others have concerns about safety, nuclear waste disposal, and the risk of accidents like Chernobyl or Fukushima. Public opinion tends to be mixed and influenced by factors such as personal values, scientific literacy, and policy preferences.
The Chernobyl nuclear disaster contaminated the water in the region with radioactive materials, such as cesium-137 and strontium-90. These radioactive elements entered rivers and groundwater, leading to long-term pollution and health concerns for those exposed to the contaminated water. Efforts have been made to monitor and clean up the affected water sources since the disaster.
How can a short answer describe this. Peoples opinions vary from outright opposition no matter what, to enthusiastic acceptance. Suggest you run a poll among all the people you can find to ask.
Nuclear reactions can be both good and bad. They can produce clean energy, like in nuclear power plants, but also be used to create nuclear weapons which have destructive capabilities. The key is in how nuclear reactions are managed and controlled.
Nuclear energy is very clean, provided you look after the spent fuel carefully, and follow good health physics practice during operation.
The kWh produced by nuclear energy is the cheapest. It is a clean energy that does not pollute the environment. It gives chance for people to work during its construction and operation. It is reliable source of energy.
Your mom uses nuclear fisson to clean your bathroom toliet to be careful where you pee!
Nuclear power underwent a decline after the accidents at 3 mile Island and in Chernobyl Russia, but it is starting to come back around in popularity as it is clean plentiful power if handled correctly. the future would have to be fission reactions using hydrogen, basicly creating a mini sun and harnessing it's power. This presents many problems and can't be implemented until it is fully understood. this type of reaction is self sustaining and can get out of control.