answersLogoWhite

0

Social Darwinists viewed the poor as being at the bottom of the social hierarchy due to their perceived lack of fitness and ability to compete successfully in society. They believed that poverty was a result of natural selection and survival of the fittest, and therefore saw little value in helping or supporting the poor.

User Avatar

AnswerBot

1y ago

What else can I help you with?

Continue Learning about Sociology

True or false- many social darwinists believed that giving dirct help to the poor or less capable worker was requierd for social progress?

False. Many social Darwinists believed in a laissez-faire approach, where they thought that helping the poor or less capable would interfere with natural selection and hinder social progress. They believed that those who were fit to survive and succeed would do so on their own, without outside help.


What was social Darwinists?

Social Darwinists were people who applied Charles Darwin's theory of natural selection to human society. They believed that competition in society would lead to the survival of the fittest and that this should be applied to social and economic policies. This ideology was used to justify inequalities and oppression in society.


Social darwinists believed that?

Social Darwinists believed that society should not protect its weaker members but should allow the fittest to survive and the less fit to die, which would aid social evolution, just as the survival of the fittest is the driving force behind biological evolution as described by Charles Darwin.


How did people were social darwinists justify imprializm?

Social Darwinists justified imperialism by arguing that it was the natural result of the struggle for existence and survival of the fittest. They believed that more advanced nations had a duty to conquer and civilize less advanced societies for their own benefit. This belief system provided a moral justification for exploiting and dominating other nations.


How did the social darwinist and members of the social gospel movement differ in their views of individual in the industriliazed society?

Social Darwinists believed in survival of the fittest, that individuals should compete for success in society, while the Social Gospel movement emphasized helping the less fortunate and promoting social justice through Christian principles. Social Darwinists viewed individuals as responsible for their own success or failure in industrialized society, while the Social Gospel movement advocated for collective responsibility and assistance for all members of society.

Related Questions

John D. Rockefeller's view that strong businesses should drive weak ones out of business was similar to views of the?

Social Darwinists


True or false- many social darwinists believed that giving dirct help to the poor or less capable worker was requierd for social progress?

False. Many social Darwinists believed in a laissez-faire approach, where they thought that helping the poor or less capable would interfere with natural selection and hinder social progress. They believed that those who were fit to survive and succeed would do so on their own, without outside help.


Who believed that society was a competition in which the fittest came out on top which justified the inequality faced by immigrants and minorities during the Gilded Age?

social Darwinist's


Why did people who were social Darwinists justify imperialism?

They accepted that we had to push out people who were standing in our way.


What was social Darwinists?

Social Darwinists were people who applied Charles Darwin's theory of natural selection to human society. They believed that competition in society would lead to the survival of the fittest and that this should be applied to social and economic policies. This ideology was used to justify inequalities and oppression in society.


How did the belief of progressives differ from those of social Darwinists?

Progressives believed in using government intervention to create social and economic reforms to improve society. Social Darwinists, on the other hand, believed in the idea of survival of the fittest and that government intervention would interfere with natural selection and the progress of society.


Social darwinists believed that?

Social Darwinists believed that society should not protect its weaker members but should allow the fittest to survive and the less fit to die, which would aid social evolution, just as the survival of the fittest is the driving force behind biological evolution as described by Charles Darwin.


What did Social Darwinists believe and how did it shape the reform movement in America?

Social Darwinists applied Charles Darwin's theory of evolution through natural selection. They believed that the weaker members of society were as they were not because of their environment, but because they were lazy, unfit people, that wanted nothing more than to bring down the rest. During the popularization of Social Darwinism, those that were considered "superior," were those of high standing, of much influence, or of wealth. The lower and middle masses, were considered weak, and through the Social Darwinist view, things that society was better off with. This was pervaded by Horatio Alger stories and the belief that if they wished, people of lower classes could rise to fame and glory. Many Social Darwinists were also advocates of eugenics, and it is through the Social Darwinist philosophy, that the US Eugenics Movement came about in the 1960s. In terms of reform, Social Darwinism did little to help. If anything, it inhibited the efforts of many Progressives. While Progressives vied for social reform, Social Darwinists were content to leave things as they were. They believed that if things were left to their own accord, natural selection would take place, and the weaker members of society would be replaced by stronger, more able members. Eventually The Progressive Movement gained more support among the public, and reforms created despite the obstacles set by Social Darwinists.


Which group believed that society was a competition justifying the inequality faced by immigrants and minorities during the Gilded Age?

Social Darwinists


Which statement would social darwinists mmost likely support?

Stronger groups have the right to rule and control weaker groups.


John d rockerfellers views that strong businesses should drive weak ones out of business is similar to the views of?

social Darwinists


How did people were social darwinists justify imprializm?

Social Darwinists justified imperialism by arguing that it was the natural result of the struggle for existence and survival of the fittest. They believed that more advanced nations had a duty to conquer and civilize less advanced societies for their own benefit. This belief system provided a moral justification for exploiting and dominating other nations.