0
A nonreligious person would say the conscience is an awareness of right and wrong.
Wiki User
∙ 8y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
How would Functionalism and Marxist theories explain employment bias and religious intolerance?
,
Where would a religious person go for support when faced with a problem?
There are several places a religious person would go for support, but it would depend on your religion. As a member of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints, I would go to my parents, bishop, or God for a problem. I have been taught this my entire life, I trust each of them, and are all spiritual leaders that can help me with any problem I face.
Explain this quote The average person is far too ignorant to make wise political decisions?
A democratic would say this quote.
To which sociological tradition does the term collective conscience belong?
This term belongs to a functionalist perspective of religion, Emile Durkheim. He believed that without 'collective conscience' society would cease to exist. He argued that religion strengthens the values and moral belief that for the basis of social life.
A religious cult would be considered a?
A religious cult could be considered a form of deviant behavior. Many religious cults defy norms that have been set forth by society.
What would you expect from a moral religious person?
A:I would expect the same standards from a moral religious person as from a moral non-religious person, no less. The one important difference would probably be the person's own assessment of the reason for his morality. The moral religious person is likely to attribute his or her morality to guidance from God; the moral non-religious person is likely to attribute his or her morality to conscience and a desire to do good for others.
Can a Jehovah's Witness support a person to attend festivals?
It is a matter of conscience of the person. We do not celebrate holidays or birthdays, so if it is one of those types of celebrations then I would say that a Jehovah's Witness wouldn't attend.
How would Functionalism and Marxist theories explain employment bias and religious intolerance?
,
How would explain to person the differences between writing to inform and writing persuade?
Writing to inform focuses on providing facts, explanations, and details to educate the audience on a specific topic. On the other hand, writing to persuade aims to convince the reader to adopt a certain viewpoint or take a specific action by appealing to their emotions, beliefs, or values. While informative writing presents information objectively, persuasive writing uses rhetoric and persuasive techniques to sway the reader's opinion.
How is a conscience formed?
It greatly depends on the ethics and moral code of the society in which you were raised. What would upset and cause regret in a person from one society would be barely or unnoticeable to someone from a different one.
What is the example of antecedent conscience?
Antecedent conscience occurs when judgment is placed before an act is committed. An example of this would be the conscience saying this is wrong, don't do it as a person is about to commit a crime.
Where would you see an epitaph written?
you would see it on tombstones it would have it to explain the person.
A person who believes in a just world would be likely to?
. . . be religious.
What do I do if one person did not receive a baby shower invitation?
You can call this person and explain what happened. I don't believe this person will be upset when you explain sincerely what happened. you would not like misunderstandings.
What is lax conscience andgive example?
A lax conscience is a conscience that is either ignored or underemployed. An example would be if someone's racist or sexually permissive.
Why would a religious person give aid?
A non-religious person would give aid because of local laws, because of sympathy, because of kindness, etc. A religious person would do so for all the above reasons, plus the fact that it is what God wants.
What is a wrong conscience?
The Catholic conscience is defined as, '...the judgment of the practical reason which decides that a particular action is in conformity with or opposition to God's law.' If one is said to have an erroneous conscience, it may be with or without fault. If it is without his own fault, he does not sin by following it, such as making being mistaken on the day and committing an activity considered sinful on that day. However, in regards to the Commandments of God, no person of ordinary intelligence can be ignorant without his own fault. For example, it is assumed (everyone) knows murder is against the Commandments, therefore would be wrong, regardless of what lack of, or mistaken, knowledge the person has.
