Yes, a group of servants is a common term used to refer to multiple individuals who work in service roles.
Slave owners referred to house servants as domestics or house slaves.
Some synonyms for indentured servants include apprentices, bondmen, and bonded laborers.
Servants typically live in the households of their employers, either in a designated area of the house or in separate servants' quarters. Their living conditions can vary depending on the household, but in general, servants are provided with accommodation, meals, and sometimes other basic necessities as part of their employment.
Yes, wealthy families in the Victorian Era often employed servants who would assist with housekeeping, cooking, and childcare. Children from affluent families would have servants to attend to their needs and care for them.
Some planters viewed indentured servants as a source of cheap labor to help grow crops and increase profits. They preferred indentured servants over slaves as they were a more temporary and less expensive labor force.
A group of servants is typically referred to as staff or household staff.
Group
moderates
Well, a group of Capulet servants start an insult match which develops into a full-out fight with a group of Montague servants.
Group of companies is grammatically correct.
Indentured servants.
indentured servants
As a group, they are called zanni.
It is correct to say "the group has" because "group" is a singular noun and takes a singular verb.
"Definitely i'll join these group too" is not correct grammar. The correct grammar is "Definitely, i will join this group too."
"Definitely i'll join these "is not correct grammar but "I will definitely join this group" is the correct grammar.
That is, None of your business sir