The Cognitive Theory acknowledges that the brain thus thinking ability is innately or biologically shaped but also suggests that it's development is influenced and later a response to experience of environmental interactions thus a social construction to some extent.
Behaviorism is more closely associated with nurture, as it emphasizes the role of external influences and environmental factors in shaping behavior. It suggests that through conditioning and reinforcement, individuals can learn and exhibit certain behaviors. Nature, on the other hand, refers to genetic and biological influences on behavior.
It depends on the behavior really.
Both.
Traits are influenced by both nature (genetics) and nurture (environment). Nature provides the genetic blueprint that shapes traits, while nurture, such as upbringing and experiences, can further influence how traits are expressed. The interaction between nature and nurture is complex and can vary for different traits.
The central issues of the nature-nurture controversy revolve around the debate of whether genetics (nature) or environment and experiences (nurture) have a greater influence on individual development and behavior. This ongoing debate seeks to understand the relative contributions of genetic inheritance and environmental factors in shaping human traits and capabilities. The controversy plays a significant role in fields such as psychology, biology, and philosophy.
Sexual orientation, including being gay, is believed to be determined by a combination of genetic, hormonal, and environmental factors. While some research suggests a biological basis for sexual orientation, the exact causes are still not fully understood. Both nature and nurture likely play a role in shaping an individual's sexual orientation.
One key issue in the nature vs nurture controversy from a sociology perspective is the impact of socialization on human behavior. Sociologists argue that while genetic factors (nature) play a role, environmental influences such as family, peers, schools, and culture (nurture) also shape an individual's development and behavior. Understanding how social forces interact with biological factors is crucial in explaining human behavior and social outcomes.
The debate between nature and nurture influencing behavior is ongoing, with evidence supporting both sides. Some traits may be more influenced by genetics (nature), while others may be shaped by environment and experiences (nurture). Ultimately, both factors likely play a role in shaping an individual's behavior and development.
Nature and nurture go hand in hand * I think *
False. Nature refers to genetics, nurture refers to environmental conditions.
nurture(phcological) natrue(environment)
nature if that is what you mean.
Nature and nurture.
Traits are influenced by both nature (genetics) and nurture (environment). Nature provides the genetic blueprint that shapes traits, while nurture, such as upbringing and experiences, can further influence how traits are expressed. The interaction between nature and nurture is complex and can vary for different traits.
The web address of the Nurture Nature Center is: www.nurturenaturecenter.org
Nature and nurture have both played a role in shaping who I am today. Nature influences my genetics and predispositions, while nurture impacts my environment and experiences. Together, they have contributed to my personality, skills, beliefs, and behaviors.
In the context of debates over the origins of knowledge, nature is to nurture as ________ is to ________.
Can a human being nurture it? No you can not, but a nature mother does!
nurture because we were made by our parents
Kohlberg's theory of moral development is a combination of both nature and nurture. He believed that individuals are born with a capacity for moral reasoning (nature), but that this capacity is influenced and developed through social interactions and experiences (nurture).