The Cognitive Theory acknowledges that the brain thus thinking ability is innately or biologically shaped but also suggests that it's development is influenced and later a response to experience of environmental interactions thus a social construction to some extent.
Traits are influenced by both nature (genetics) and nurture (environment). Nature provides the genetic blueprint that shapes traits, while nurture, such as upbringing and experiences, can further influence how traits are expressed. The interaction between nature and nurture is complex and can vary for different traits.
The central issues of the nature-nurture controversy revolve around the debate of whether genetics (nature) or environment and experiences (nurture) have a greater influence on individual development and behavior. This ongoing debate seeks to understand the relative contributions of genetic inheritance and environmental factors in shaping human traits and capabilities. The controversy plays a significant role in fields such as psychology, biology, and philosophy.
Sexual orientation, including being gay, is believed to be determined by a combination of genetic, hormonal, and environmental factors. While some research suggests a biological basis for sexual orientation, the exact causes are still not fully understood. Both nature and nurture likely play a role in shaping an individual's sexual orientation.
The key issue in nature vs nurture controversy based on sociology is whether human beings behave differently due to birth or because of how they are raised. Sociology discusses the social factors effecting human behavior.
Nurture is by definition an act or series of acts that foster growth or development. It implies the thing being nurtured is in existence. THis is important because in the definition of Nature, a thing is caused to be or to come into existence. Nature suggests DNA and many medical and psychological findings are traced to our DNA family, ethinic and geographical histories over time. I believe therefore Nature is more influential and that the question is best answered in relation to specifics, such as placing the question in a series of contexts including: is nurture more ifluential than nature as it relates to childhood behavior during various stages of development. In this context the question becomes more interesting as it relates to the influences upon the developing mind of a person. In that case I believe the answer would then be that nurture would be more influential. One person's humble opinion to this intriguing question.
Nature and nurture go hand in hand * I think *
False. Nature refers to genetics, nurture refers to environmental conditions.
nature if that is what you mean.
Nature and nurture.
Traits are influenced by both nature (genetics) and nurture (environment). Nature provides the genetic blueprint that shapes traits, while nurture, such as upbringing and experiences, can further influence how traits are expressed. The interaction between nature and nurture is complex and can vary for different traits.
The web address of the Nurture Nature Center is: www.nurturenaturecenter.org
Nurture Means Care. So You Need Somebody To Nurture You Until You Are Old Enough To Nurture Yourself But Still With Your Parents For Like 8 More Years. Nature Affects You Because We Need Nature To Live. If We Didn't Have Nature Would Die The Second We Were Born.
nurture because we were made by our parents
Can a human being nurture it? No you can not, but a nature mother does!
Nature vs. NurtureNature is the role of HEREDITY, while Nurture is the role of ENVIRONMENT...In NATURE, a behavior can get through hereditary, while in NURTURE, a behavior can be enhanced,or can be improved through the environment ..
Nurture
nature versus nurture